Search Results

The billionaire family funding childhood sex changes. The Pritzker family has long since been known as not only an Illinois dynasty, but also as a thorn in the side of progress for LGB&T Illinoisans. They have long since been identified as one of the wealthiest families in the United States and are recognized by their business holdings in various corporations. In addition, one of the most recognizable members of the family is currently the governor of Illinois. However, the Pritzker family has also been recognized for their views on the transgender indoctrination of children. One of the most well-known family members goes by the name of Jennifer Pritzker. Jennifer was born as a biological male and later in life, transitioned to being a woman. According to the Family Research Council, “Pritzker donated $1 million to the Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago for a Gender and Sex Development Program." Jennifer Pritzker also founded (and continues to run) the TAWANI foundation. The TAWANI foundation provides grants to what they describe as ‘health and human rights.' In addition, The Pritzker family fortune has been tied directly toward LGBT organizations that teach their opinions and views to a very young and at-risk audience. One particular example was reported by The Hill, a Washington D.C. based new organization. “It began with requiring schools to teach the role and contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people in history textbooks. One of the first states to adopt this was Illinois, where James Pritzker’s cousin J.B. Pritzker, signed it into law." Since 2019, The Pritzker family has been providing ‘charitable donations’ and other financial assistance toward gender affirming care for minor aged children. One of the most noticeable examples is with the Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago. There exists a department referred to as the ‘Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health’ and was started with a ‘$15 million gift from the Pritzker Foundation in 2019.' During 2019, Governor Pritzker also issued Executive Order 19-11. As reported by TabletMag, the Executive Order was titled as “Strengthening Our Commitment to Affirming and Inclusive Schools, to welcome and support children with manufactured sex identities." In 2021, a new sexual education bill was signed into law (Bill SB0 818). The bill would instill gender ideology as well as gender role stereotypes and sexual reproduction for Kindergarten through 2nd grade children. “By Grades 3-5, children should be able to describe the potential role of hormone blockers on young people who identify as transgender." Is the Pritzker family directly indoctrinating children in order to get the support of a broader group? Perhaps it’s to gain support for JB’s potential future presidential run. It’s certainly possible in a state like Illinois. Children’s minds are still developing and will continue to do so until about age 25. References: The Staggering Reach of Billionaire Transgender Activists (frc.org) Illinois House votes to require LGBT history curriculum be taught in schools | The Hill Our Focus - Tawani Foundation JB Pritzker, Jennifer Pritzker, & Synthetic Sex Identities - Tablet Magazine

You may have seen Jeffrey Marsh around various corners of the internet from different angles that depend on which side of the woke culture spectrum you fall on. If you ask the neo-LGBTQ+ crowd that believes you can use different pronouns every single day and demand strangers be arrested for not following along, Marsh is a “non-binary transgender inspirational life coach, writer and LGBTQ activist,” who offers tidbits of advice (typically addressed to “kids”) primarily through TikTok and Patreon. If you don’t believe in a recently invented set of pseudo-nonsensical psychologically manipulative ideals about gender, Marsh is a man who seems to believe he’s invented cross-dressing and enjoys telling young people to cut off their parents and talk to him instead, sometimes for a fee. Fans and supporters are asked to refer to Marsh using “they/them” pronouns, which will not be done in this article. To claim to be both non-binary and transgender is contradictory. One is either an androgynous man or woman who enjoys cross-dressing or a transsexual, one who has medically and physically transitioned to present as the opposite sex. Instead of this reality that was once widely accepted, Marsh pushes the ideas that the gender binary is wrong. According to Jeffrey, gender is a construct, gender is not the same and sex, and you can in fact reject this reality in favor of your own. And if your family and friends can’t accept that, Jeffrey Marsh is here to emotionally coach you through it. In fact, if you pay extra, he’ll be your personal life coach. Marsh’s qualifications for giving life advice include living as a monk for years in California to learn the art of Soto Zen and becoming a licensed life coach, though there is no accessible evidence of the license itself. There are several disclaimers on his site and Patreon that imply he doesn’t speak directly to supporters, cannot diagnose mental illnesses and does not offer services to minors. He is known for occasionally making one of his supporters chase him down after paying a whopping $1k for his “Premium Package” of Zoom meetings. Marsh built his fan base by writing a self-help book and spouting cliches in videos, which has lead him to an endorsement on Oprah’s website. All in all, one can see Marsh has tried to cover his bases and avoid controversy, but that hasn’t stopped people from pointing out the obvious: Jeffrey Marsh wants to talk to your kids. Jeffrey doesn’t have any kids, alludes to having a strained relationship with his own parents, and opens many videos with “I wanna talk to the kids,” or “Hi, kids!” He has also described himself as “Christlike,” despite practicing Buddhism. Grooming 101 involves establishing a relationship with the intended target and either separating the target from their families or establishing a relationship with their families as well. Marsh is big on what is referred to as “going no contact,” or cutting off family members if they “don’t understand you.” His use of language and speech pattern often resembles cult leaders who lure members in with wide eyes and a soft voice to demand control. It’s important to know the signs of grooming with the intent of sexual abuse. Those who do may recognize several of the signs in Jeffrey’s content. But the average person who has never seen one of his videos, upon watching just a handful, would more than likely ask themselves “who is this creep and why does he want to talk to kids so much?” But Jeffrey has deflected these accusations more than once, often turning on the commenter and accusing them of the same behavior, which is a classic narcissistic tactic of someone who does not want to acknowledge what they themselves are doing. Marsh’s fan base can be vicious, and a few of them even managed to track down one of his accusers, posting photos of her without her hijab and threatening her entire family. [source] Marsh seems to project a lot of his own issues for someone who claims to coach others through life, but since he’s not actually a licensed therapist, it seems he can get away with toeing a very careful line while encouraging young people to sign up for a more private line of communicating with him. We cannot yet prove that Jeffrey Marsh is actively abusing minors, but we sure do recommend knowing who he is and making sure he isn’t influencing your children. Until then, we’re keeping a vigilant eye out for Mr. Marsh in the headlines. And for good measure, here’s a creepy compilation of videos of himself deleted, but the internet never forgets. Sources: Daily Citizen: Yes, Trans Activists Admit They Are Grooming Your Kids - Daily Citizen (focusonthefamily.com) The American Conservative Jeffrey Marsh Groomer 101 TikTok Tutorial - The American Conservative BySurf Jeffrey Marsh: The CHILD GROOMER of LGBTQ

Lawsuits are being filed against public schools all over the country as the rights of parents are being pushed to the side in order to conceal the preferred pronouns and new transgender identities of children all across America. According to Education Week, “Over the last three years, parents in at least six states have sued school districts over policies the districts say support transgender, gender nonconforming, and nonbinary students (Pendharkar, 2023)." The efforts made to sue public schools for such things usually don’t make it very far due to state policy and legislature. If you live in Washington State, you probably wouldn’t be surprised to find that informing parents of their child’s gender transition or new preferred pronouns is simply against school policy. Any teacher that breaks this policy in Washington State will likely lose their job. According to research done by the Williams Institute, 1.09% of Washington children between ages 13-17 identified as transgender in 2022 (Herman et al., 2022). That’s over twice as many as the 0.7% of trans-identifying Washington children they found in their 2017 study (Herman et al., 2017). In order to understand why so many Washington children are falling prey to gender ideology, it’s important to understand that it is being presented to them at school on a regular basis from a very young age. For example, the Seattle Public School website expresses that they are in full support of teaching children about transgender identity and expression to the extent that they even share samples of videos and lessons intended to teach gender ideology to children from kindergarten to 5th grade (Seattle Public Schools, 2022). There are literally hundreds of books relating to gender ideology spread all throughout the Seattle Public School libraries (Seattle Public School, 2022) and that doesn’t include books brought directly into classrooms by teachers and other LGBTQ+ organizations. What used to be the Gay Straight Alliance is now called the "Gender and Sexuality Alliance" and they are no longer only in high schools. Some Washington middle schools also have the GSA available as a resource for confused children as well. Gender ideology is written into the school curriculum and ingrained into everyday life at school to the point that every child will be encouraged to question their sex before they hit puberty. According to the Washington State School Directors Association, the school employees are to set up a meeting with any transgender-identifying child as soon as they are made aware of the child’s decision to go by a different name or change of pronouns. The purpose of the meeting is to ask the child if they need accommodation for their transition and to ask the child if they want their new identity kept from the parents. Policy 3211 states “Before communicating with parents of transgender or gender expansive students, it’s important to ask the student how school employees should refer to the student when talking with their parents and guardians. For families who are supportive, using the student’s name and pronoun could be affirming for the student. For parents who are not supportive, or who are not aware of the student’s transition at school, referring to their name and pronoun could be very dangerous. The district will not condone the intentional or persistent refusal to respect a student’s gender identity or gender expression, or inappropriate release of information regarding a student’s transgender or gender-expansive status” (Gender-Inclusive Schools, 2019). We encourage all Washington parents to pay close attention to what is happening at their child’s school. Children in the Washington public school system will be introduced to gender ideology at school, regardless of whether or not parental authorities are informed. Even if your child’s teacher wants to keep you informed, they are not allowed to release any information about your child’s gender identity or expression without the child’s permission. Every school employee must affirm your child’s new transgender identity according to policy 3211 which states “The school must use the name and gender by which the student identifies on all other records, including but not limited to school identification cards, classroom seating charts, athletic rosters, yearbook entries, diplomas, directory information” (Gender-Inclusive Schools [procedure], 2019). You can look through your child’s backpack, social media and make an appearance on campus, but you cannot depend on their school to let you know if your child is heading down the path of gender transition. True inclusiveness does not exclude parents or disregard parental consent. Nobody should ever feel excluded from their children's education. Teachers being instructed to keep secrets from parents is wrong, especially when it involves medical interventions that come with severe ramifications. Allowing a child to adopt a secret identity at school is not the way to teach acceptance. All this does is instill distrust in parents that their son or daughter may be living a secret day-to-day life. And in turn, it teaches children that they cannot trust the adults in their lives. Gays Against Groomers promotes the idea that in order to foster an education system that benefits everyone, it is going to take unity amongst people who wish to lead by example in their communities. It is necessary to optimize communication between students, parents, teachers, school boards, those who make the decisions, and their respective communities. As standardized test scores keep plummeting lower and lower, an entire generation of boys and girls may depend on it. REFERENCES Pendharkar, Eesha. “Parents Are Suing Schools over Pronoun Policies. Here’s What You Need to Know.” Education Week, Education Week, 15 May 2023, www.edweek.org/leadership/parents-are-suing-schools-over-pronoun-policies-heres-what-you-need-to-know/2023/05. Herman, Jody L, et al. “How Many Adults and Youth Identify as Transgender in the United States?” Williams Institute, June 2022, williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Trans-Pop-Update-Jun-2022.pdf. Herman, Jody L, Andrew Flores, and Taylor Brown. “Age of Individuals Who Identify as Transgender in the United States.” AGE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO IDENTIFY AS TRANSGENDER IN THE UNITED STATES, Jan. 2017, williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Age-Trans-Individuals-Jan-2017.pdf. Seattle Public Schools. “K-5 Gender Books, Lessons, and Videos.” Seattle Public Schools, 25 Mar. 2022, www.seattleschools.org/departments/health-education/lgbtq-programs-curriculum-and-support/list-of-books-by-grade/. Seattle Public Schools. “Library Services.” Seattle Public Schools, 3 Mar. 2023, spscatalog.seattleschools.org/cataloging/servlet/handlebasicsearchform.do. “Gender-Inclusive Schools (Procedure).” Washington State School Directors Association, 1 July 2019, wssda.app.box.com/s/1c2bjp451nezhbdjvyxl2fqcwvuwdxaa.

The war on children is more noticeable than ever. They are being injected with synthetic hormones before they can properly consent. They are receiving surgeries that irreversibly damage their bodies. They are told that this is necessary and they cannot live a happy life without receiving off-label interventions to satisfy an urge that was put in their heads by the adults in their lives who they are supposed to trust the most. "Gender-affirming care" has been declared as experimental – rightfully so. Boys and girls are being used as lab rats. They are being experimented on. And it doesn't just stop there. Just when you thought the war on children could not get any worse, a new experiment is gaining popularity and endangering our most vulnerable: newborn babies. Men who identify as women are now seeking resources to breastfeed babies. This sacred act that has always been between a mother and her newborn baby is now being colonized by adult men pumping themselves with dangerous drugs to “affirm" their "gender identity” via having a newborn suck on their male nipples. In order to truly understand how outrageous this is, one must first understand how important breastfeeding is. Breastfeeding is one of the most natural processes a woman can carry out, on the basis of health, maternity, and biological functioning. It is an aspect of motherhood that must be protected at all costs. Breastfeeding provides critical unmatched protection for newborn babies in the first few months of life, as well as creating a unique bond between a mother and her child that is not like any other. Breast milk is referred to as liquid gold, as it contains more than 200 ingredients including water, proteins, good fats, carbohydrates, antibodies, lactoferrin, vitamins A, D, E and K, minerals, necessary hormones, growth factor and good bacteria. The CDC states that breastfeeding helps protect babies from asthma, obesity, type 1 diabetes, severe lower respiratory diseases, acute otitis media, gastrointestinal infections, necrotizing enterocolitis, creates constant and routine mother/baby interaction, helps increase skin to skin duration, and even helps prevent SIDS. Breastfeeding provides ALL of the nutrients a baby needs, and your breast milk changes daily to adjust to your baby's individual needs. During a growth spurt, your baby will signal to their mothers body to produce more high fat milk by cluster feeding. When a baby is sick, their saliva will trigger a biological response when in contact with their mother's nipples, triggering her body to produce more milk with illness-specific antibodies. Women are the ONLY mammals in the animal kingdom whose milk fluctuates antibodies depending on the health of mother and her baby. Holistic doctors often suggest putting drops of breast milk (from a EBF mom) into babies' ears or eyes to help clear up irritation or infection. Breast milk can be used for diaper rashes, a natural eczema treatment, and to cure cradle cap. Breastfeeding doesn't only provide benefits for babies, it also has many benefits for the mother, such as reduced risk of postpartum depression, helps engage and facilitate maternal bonding, lowers the risk for type 2 diabetes, and even lowers the risk of cancer. According to Dr. Ruth Petersen, director of CDC’s Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity,“Breastfeeding provides unmatched health benefits for babies and mothers. It is the clinical gold standard for infant feeding and nutrition, with breast milk uniquely tailored to meet the health needs of a growing baby. We must do more to create supportive and safe environments for mothers who choose to breastfeed.” All of these benefits do not come easily. It is extremely difficult for most mothers to exclusively breastfeed their babies. According to the CDC, only 24% of babies are exclusively breastfed through 6 months and only 17% percent are still breastfed at 18 months - despite the World Health Organization recommending breastfeeding until at least the age of two. The early days of breastfeeding a newborn is filled with pure exhaustion. It's a commitment to give your entire self, physically and mentally, to this new little human. Unlike formula-fed babies, exclusively breastfed babies need to feed every two hours, around the clock, 24/7 with no breaks. This means the mother will be attached to her baby at all times with the exception of the 60 minute intervals she has for sleep. A new mother's breasts will fill and become engorged as her body regulates to the rhythm of her new baby's needs. Despite the early challenges, babies are born with the instinct to be breastfed. Once they are born and placed onto the mother's chest for “skin to skin," they will root as they are cued simply by SMELLING their mother. Newborns are tuned into mothers smell, sound of her heartbeat, and voice. The first few weeks of life, a baby has to work overtime to breastfeed. Latching correctly is difficult for both mom and baby, and the baby has to really work to stimulate the breast into let down. In fact, breastfeeding is so tiring for a newborn that they usually need to sleep immediately after feeding. Sometimes they are too tired to stimulate let down and have to be roused to ensure proper nutrition. Women’s breasts are designed for let down, males' nipples are not. A baby latching onto a male nipple to suckle for milk will have to suckle past the point of exhaustion just to get a drop. Studies have shown that even with medication to help produce “milk” production, it is not enough for it to be nutritionally beneficial for the baby. Men who call themselves "mothers" are using The Newman-gold garb protocol, a protocol which was originally developed for mothers of adopted babies or for mothers whose baby was born via surrogate. The protocol involves taking exogenous hormones to induce lactating and breast pumping every 2-3 hours. This method was NOT intended for males to use. The chemicals that these men are using in an attempt to lactate are Domperidone and Motilium, which increase levels of prolactin, thus tricking their male bodies into producing milk. This drug is incredibly dangerous and is banned in the United States. The U.S pulled Domperidone from the market after it was found to be causing fatal cardiac arrhythmias. Its intended use is to help treat nausea and vomiting. Using it as an attempt to induce lactation is off label. There have been studies on this drug and it has been found to pass through breast milk and enter babies' bodies. Yes, you read the right. These off-label drugs, some of which are dangerous and illegal, are entering the newborn's bodies. This sounds very unsafe. And infants cannot communicate if they are having any negative side effects from this poison. It has been widely shared that the potential effects of this medication could cause potentially FATAL outcomes for the newborn. This is not breast milk. It may look or taste like breast milk, but it is poison, plain and simple. Not to mention there has been no significant evidence to suggest this toxic fluid is equivalent to female breast milk. There has been one study showing male breast milk does contain "...Values of protein, fat, lactose and calorie content at or above those of standard-term milk," but as stated above, those are not the only ingredients in natural womens breast milk – nor does it account for the importance of changing antibodies to protect and heal. There is much risk with no reward for the baby. Why would anyone do such a thing to a newborn baby, when it can potentially harm them…or worse. The attempt to normalize male breastfeeding does not only create space for potential physical and emotional harm, but there is also an erotic component to it. It is a paraphilic disorder which primarily occurs in heterosexual men. These men are often married to/partner with women. And it has been noted that they become jealous of their wives while she is pregnant. This paraphilia is called "Autogynephilia," which simply means "love for oneself as a woman." Autogynephilia has been sweeping the nation and bleeding heavily into transgender spaces. It is defined as a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as female. These men go through Hormone Replacement Therapy and get surgery in order to obtain female-looking body parts in order to satisfy their fetishistic desire for womanhood. While trans activists claim that this phenomenon is not real, it is still diagnosed as a sub-category of Transvestic Disorder. Research on the topic is still carried out. So far, there are four different types of autogynephilia that have been documented in men who identify as women (Lawrence, 2012). The four types are Transvestic Autogynephilia (erotic arousal associated with the act or fantasy of wearing women’s clothing), Anatomic Autogynephilia (arousal associated with the fantasy or reality of having female anatomic features), Behavioral Autogynephilia (arousal associated with the act or fantasy of engaging in female-typical behavior), and Physiologic Autogynephilia (arousal associated with the fantasy or simulation of being pregnant, menstruating, or lactating). Although physiologic autogynephilia is probably the least common type, several informants and case studies have noted its presence in these men. Fantasies involving pregnancy were especially frequent in this group (2012). It's a fetish. It is a fetish which manifests into a paraphilic disorder where they experience distress from not having female bodies. The most disturbing part is that men who have this erotic dysfunction are trying to obtain "civil rights" on the basis of their so-called "gender identity." What civil rights do they not have? The hard truth is that they are campaigning for the "civil right" to force others to participate in their fetish. They often experience sexual gratification from being referred to as women and obtaining female-typical anatomy. "Transgender rights" are currently a hot topic in the United States. They include easy access to hormones and surgery on demand. And they include "pronoun mandates," where it is required to refer to a man as she/her, or else one can get charged with "sex harassment" towards these men. It strips women of their free speech, forcing them to lie and unknowingly participate in somebody's autogynephilic sexual fantasy…or else. Everyone has different opinions on pronoun usage, have a right to free speech, and the ability to call others what they want. This takes away that free speech and people are not allowed to opt-out of partaking in somebody's fetish. It is a form of boundary violation to force a woman to participate in a man's sexual fetish without her knowledge or consent. Nobody has the "civil right" to coerce women into satisfying a man's sexual fetish. And this is being forced upon the public under the guise of "inclusion, tolerance, and acceptance." No, thank you. How many autogynephilic men are using the label of "transgender" to breastfeed their newborn babies while simultaneously receiving sexual pleasure from their paraphilia? The act of breastfeeding is natural for a mother and her baby. It is something that should be understood and protected in all circumstances. A mother sustains life, single handedly through a biological process only a woman possesses. A baby is fine tuned to instinctually cling to their biological mother for their protection and nutritional needs. Fathers do not and should not breastfeed - and a man can never be a mother. Sacrificing babies in the name of “gender affirming care” in order to indulge a sick delusion should never be normalized.

In 2007 the iPhone was officially released to the public, marking a significant turning point in technological development.Since then, users of iPhones and smartphones alike have been able to chat with distant relatives, bank online, and download a complete library of music. Apps like YouTube, Twitter, and Meta (formally known as Facebook and Instagram) became mainstream media sites. People used the iPhone in a way that increased productivity. With all the hype, parents felt obligated or pressured to give their teenagers phones and tablets. Eventually, smartphones and tablets were brought to classrooms to be used as learning tools. But as some of us understand, technology is both a blessing and a curse. The unintended consequences of giving young people access to powerful technology 24/7 has been a massive oversight. Sites like Pornhub.com are easily accessible to anyone with a smartphone. Anyone can lie about their age with a simple tap. YouTube videos shuffle through an automatic playlist based on an algorithm, which can quickly become twisted and perverse. By allowing children access to infinite content, we have endangered developing minds. Not only do young children have access to pornography, adults have access to this new genre of distracting “entertainment.” Young minds can be exposed to content depicting scenarios that reinforce a narrative that they too can engage in obscene acts with no consequences. It’s no secret that pornography has been around since the invention of video and print. One could make the argument that porn is a loosely used word. If we expanded this word to include drawings, we could safely say it has been around for ages. Even during the Roman era, they had images that were pornographic. Famous scenes of young male prostitutes engaging in sex acts with older men was not uncommon. History of humans tells us that porn is embedded in society, whether that be through videos, drawings, or pictures. With the invention of the internet, the possibilities of pornography became limitless. Sites like Pornhub host studios that cater to just about anyone all around the world. Thanks to this flexibility, people with dark desires can indulge, even if those desires include pedophelic fantasies. In a channel 4 documentary titled “Porn Actors Pretend To Be Underage During Sex,” the adult actor Austin depicts himself as an underage boy. This is unfortunately common in themes of pornography. The films are centered around "daddies" having sex with their sons. The genre is called Daddy/son porn, and similar incestual genres exist. Now people have access to fantasize about daddies having sex with their own sons. Not only is this incest, it is also pedophilic. One can fantasize about something to such a level that they may consciously or unconsciously seek it out in the real world. These videos are often allowed to exist, even if the actors are technically underage, largely due to laws in other countries where the age of consent is lower and the laws are looser. To say this content doesn’t have devastating effects on the human brain would be utter folly. Multiple scientific studies have proven that when grown men in particular regularly consume pornography, their motivation is whittled away while their prefrontal cortex becomes weaker. Anything one does frequently can alter the brain, but frequent pornography consumption quite literally cripples the part of the brain that makes decisions, plans, and regulates emotions. Additionally, pornography changes the way adults relate to one another as well as their sexual expectations, which are typically unrealistic as well as violent depending on the type of pornography a person is interested in. Therefore, trying to regulate and normalize pornography for young people who haven’t reached full cognitive development is extremely dangerous, and has the potential to create a generation of miswired hyper-sexualized adults who aren’t able to connect or empathize with one another. In fact, one could argue that that has already happened. This is the destructive side of limitless technology, and sites that host pornography are well aware. They simply do not care. The sites that cater to these individuals have a Machiavellian agenda. They are putting this content out to garner more dollars, and they argue that this content is to help pedophiles experience their fantasies without engaging in any illegal activities. But not only does pornography rewire the brain, it creates addictive behaviors and opens doors to ideas and concepts to both adults and children alike that could prove detrimental to their wellbeing. Porn sites have been paving a long immoral road to normalized pedophilia with no regard as to the long term impacts on society and future generations. We have to start acknowledging this and holding these sites accountable for enabling this darkness before it’s too late. REFERENCES “How Does Pornhub Make Money: Business Model Explained.” Adent Blog, 24 Mar. 2023, adent.io/blog/how-does-pornhub-make-money Porn Actor Pretends To Be Underage During Sex YouTube 1 December 2021 youtube.com/watch?v=ENbJem8VvRc Your Brain on Porn and Other Sexual Images - Scientific American scientificamerican.com/article/your-brain-on-porn-and-other-sexual-images/

“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” - Title IX, Women's Liberation Movement (1972) Title IX was a pivotal moment in the fight for equality for males and females, on the basis of sex. Title IX addresses sex-based discrimination in any educational program or activity that receives federal funding. It is designed to provide sex-based rights and protect individuals from discrimination based on their sex – male or female. Under Title IX, schools are required to provide equal opportunities and benefits to both male and female students in all areas, including admissions, athletics, academics, and extracurricular activities. It prohibits sex-based discrimination in any form, such as differential treatment, harassment, or exclusion. These rights are essential for promoting a safe and fair educational environment. The Biden Administration has interpreted Title IX to protect "transgender students" from sex-based discrimination. The U.S. Department of Education has issued guidance indicating that schools should treat students consistent with their "gender identity." This would dramatically broaden the scope of existing Title IX protections. By adding "gender identity" as a protected sex-based category, then "sex" no longer means what it was intended to. If sex and gender are different, then why is there a push to add gender as a subcategory of sex, therefore conflating the two? The Biden Administration's proposed updates mention that although "sex" was always interpreted to refer to male and female, sex is actually a complicated topic and cannot be properly defined. They also make note that when Title IX was first created, there was no solid specification for what "sex" refers to in the law. That is ridiculous. Sex-based rights always referred to maleness and femaleness, according to corresponding laws and the way they were implemented. The reason why they didn't bother to provide a definition of "sex" in 1972 probably has something to do with the fact that up until three years ago, everybody knew how babies were made. And it was not considered hateful to say that humans cannot change sex. Laws like these are completely dependent on the sex binary because they divide people into two sex classes to address the way that biological sex impacts how they are treated differently and the discrimination that arises from sex differences. Those who disagree with this new interpretation argue that allowing "transgender students" to access the rights and protections reserved for the opposite sex is unfair and may undermine opportunities and privacy rights. The Biden Administration's decision to add "gender identity" to Title IX led to an avalanche of bills being filed across the nation, many of which directly interfere with the proposed updates. Gays Against Groomers has loudly supported many of these bills and have worked with lawmakers to pass legislation. We primarily have focused on the public school curriculum, female-only sports and spaces in schools, sex harassment guidelines, and child transition. All of these issues are directly related to preserving Title IX in its original form. These bills have been misrepresented in the media and labeled as "anti-LGBTQ+" but all they do is restore common sense and reality. The state of North Carolina recently passed three laws that are consistent with the original interpretation of sex and gender in the law. They were originally vetoed by Governor Cooper, but the vetoes were overridden this week. Here's the breakdown from our point of view: Sports and Spaces "The North Carolina house and senate has now officially overridden the veto of Gov Cooper of HB 574, the Fairness in Women's Sports Act. The bill is now law in North Carolina! It passed with bipartisan support." The passage of Title IX in 1972 meant that by 1973 there were college scholarships at the larger schools, money for equipment and uniforms, and expanded travel schedules. In 1971, fewer than 295,000 girls participated in high school varsity athletics, accounting for just 7 percent of all varsity athletes; in 2001, that number leaped to 2.8 million, or 41.5 percent of all varsity athletes, according to the National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. In 1966, 16,000 females competed in intercollegiate athletics. By 2001, that number jumped to more than 150,000, accounting for 43 percent of all college athletes. In addition, a 2008 study of intercollegiate athletics showed that women’s collegiate sports had grown to 9,101 teams, or 8.65 per school. The five most frequently offered college sports for women are, in order: (1) basketball, 98.8% of schools have a team, (2) volleyball, 95.7%, (3) soccer, 92.0%, (4) cross country, 90.8%, and (5) softball, 89.2%. Since 1972, women have also competed in the traditional male sports of wrestling, weightlifting, rugby, and boxing (Winslow). Girls deserve to compete fairly in their sports without getting beaten by mediocre male athletes and potentially being injured. This law restores sex-based protections for female athletes to not get hurt in their sports. Allowing male and female students to compete with one another is a safety issue. There have been multiple instances where girls have become injured after playing contact sports against boys. A lot of the women in our organization were tomboys when they were young. If they were growing up today, then they would be at risk of getting injured. Policies and procedures that may affect students' safety or include allowing mixed sex provisions for sports, toilets, changing and overnight accommodation which impacts on other protected characteristics such as sex and religion or belief. Under Title IX, “institutions may have separate toilet, shower and locker room facilities. And institutions may ‘provide separate housing on the basis of sex.’” Jeldness v. Pearce, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1994). Title IX states that “nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit any educational institution receiving funds under this Act, from maintaining separate living facilities for the different sexes.” 20 U.S.C. § 1686. Title IX’s regulations further state that “[a] recipient may provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex.” 34 C.F.R. § 106.33. Thus, under the plain language of Title IX, schools can have separate restrooms, locker rooms, and showers for boys and girls without jeopardizing funding. Schools were allowing girls to use the same restrooms and locker rooms as their male peers without parental consent. If a girl wanted to identify her way into a facility full of teenage boys, then parents would be left completely in the dark about the fact that their daughter could potentially be in danger. The state of Wisconsin has recently witnessed some "unintended consequences of the proposed Title IX regulations (Brewer, 2023). Following a swim class during first-hour physical education in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, four freshmen girls rinsed off in the women’s locker room. As was their normal practice, they kept their swimsuits on. But as they were showering, an adult male student entered the locker room, undressed, exposed his genitalia, and showered next to the girls, casually announcing, "I’m trans by the way." While this incident is upsetting, what is perhaps equally concerning is that the district administrators failed to do anything for the girls when they learned what happened (Brewer, 2023). It is not "anti-trans and anti-LGBTQ" to ensure that girls are safe in their sports and spaces. Some of the people who benefit from these sex-based protections are lesbian and bisexual. Erasing such protections negatively impacts them just as much as it impacts people who are not included in the LGBTQ+ acronym. Classroom Material "It’s hard to imagine that just forty years ago, young women were not admitted into many colleges and universities, athletic scholarships were rare, and math and science was a realm reserved for boys. Girls square danced instead of playing sports, studied home economics instead of training for "male-oriented" (read: higher-paying) trades. The school curriculum promoted the idea that girls could become teachers and nurses, but not doctors or principals (Winslow, Barbara)." SB 49, dubbed the “Parents' Bill of Rights bans instruction on “gender identity, sexual activity, or sexuality” in kindergarten through fourth grade. Bills like these include pornographic material in schools and lessons about queer ideology. Public schools have recently implemented giving children surveys that ask sexual questions and keep a record of students' mental health, which is an invasion of privacy and wildly inappropriate. For instance, they ask students about sexual intercourse and information about their sexual history, featuring questions like "Have you ever had oral sex? How old were you when you had sexual intercourse for the first time?" They also ask invasive questions about the student's family, mental health, and seek to change their behavior outside of school. These surveys ask children questions about their parents' political opinions, income, and family attitudes (Courage Is A Habit, 2023). Not only is this an invasion of privacy, but many parents feel like their information is being extorted and used as a method of control. These are also carried out without parental knowledge. According to “progressive” activists, saying that you support parental rights is a “homophobic dog whistle.” The gay parents in our movement beg to differ. Gay and lesbian parents don’t want their children exposed to sexualized content in the classroom more than any other set of parents. Assuming that all of us think the same way is woke homophobia at its finest. The Parents' Bill of Rights specifically gives parents the ability to opt-out of this corrupt scam and the option to see the content of these surveys to decide for themselves. Sex Harassment Title IX originally protected girls from various forms of sexual harassment, on the basis of sex. When "gender identity" is added to the category of sex, then that also changes the meaning of sexual harassment. Sexual harassment has been changed to "sex harassment," and refers to anything that does not affirm a child's "gender identity." It mandates that teachers and staff use the child's preferred pronouns and allow them to go by a different name and persona in school than at home. Parents are left in the dark. Bills like the ones passed in North Carolina require that parents be notified “prior to any changes in the name or pronoun used for a student in school records or by school personnel." It also will discipline teachers who purposely keep secrets from parents. The guidelines asserted that students' identities were being socially transitioned at school because this would positively affect their mental health. However, recent data says otherwise. A new study that recently came out surveyed 1,655 parents of children who have recently adopted a cross-sex identity. They found that after social transition, children became much worse off, showing an increase in psychosocial distress (Diaz et. al, 2023). Their mental health deteriorated considerably. Socially transitioning a child at school might actually harm children’s mental health. If children are told that they are trapped in the wrong body and the only way that they can be happy is if they amputate their body parts, then they are going to become anxious, insecure, and scared. Not only that, but it would be considered "sex harassment" for teachers to not play along. These "trans kids" are being celebrated every day and told that they are living their authentic selves by pretending to be something that they aren't. Instead of helping distressed children navigate their identity, their confusion is reinforced. Social transition is directly correlated with persistence in trans identity, and these children are more likely to become sterilized with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. LET KIDS BE KIDS! Everyone figures themselves out eventually. These topics are way too complex for children to understand. Gays Against Groomers fully supports the laws that are being put in place to roll back "gender identity" policies in schools and bring the education system back to normal. None of these laws are anti-gay in the slightest, and we do not appreciate them being framed as such. As we firmly stated in our testimony that we submitted on behalf of Chapter 117 in Maine, we made it clear that "Children are NOT a social experiment. While you usher minors down a conveyor belt to lifelong pharmaceutical dependency, we will continue to stand against you until the abuse is stopped. This has gone on long enough and we will not allow this to be done in our name. Children deserve to grow up into healthy adults and live their life in ways which make them happy. Policies like this one prevent them from ever achieving that." We contacted The Department of Education this Spring and demanded that Title IX and similar laws be legislated the way they were intended to be – on the basis of sex not gender. We even passed a bill in Missouri that does exactly that. An ideologically-charged education system that prioritizes affirming every child's special identity makes it impossible to address necessary academic needs. Public schools are failing in their basic mission to educate young Americans; as a result, we are in the midst of a full-blown disaster of illiteracy and innumeracy. Eighth graders’ average math test scores have dropped to their lowest levels in 35 years. Their reading scores are the lowest in two decades (Matthew, 2023). The sexualized material puts them at risk of dissociating from their embodied reality. And it encourages them to adopt a potentially harmful identity, sometimes leading to sterilization. This entire system needs to be dismantled and backpedaled to where it was just a few short years ago. We are on the right side of history. And we will continue to speak out and fight until laws like these are passed nationwide, Queer Theory is no longer referenced in classrooms, and "gender identity" is destroyed once and for all. REFERENCES Title IX Fact Sheet (2022) https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9nprm-factsheet.pdf Title IX -- Proposed Changes https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9nprm.pdf Title IX Of The Education Amendments Of 1972 https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-ix-education-amendments-1972# Senate Bill 49 -- Parents' Bill of Rights https://ncleg.gov/BillLookUp/2023/S49 Fairness in Women's Sports Act https://www.ncleg.gov/BillLookUp/2023/h574 https://twitter.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1691941538266222794?t=4knlta_d3D7D3nfaraAzJA&s=19 North Carolina legislature overrides governor’s vetoes to enact 3 bills targeting transgender youth Dianne Gallagher, 2023 https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/16/politics/north-carolina-gop-governor-veto-override-transgender-bills/index.html?utm_term=link&utm_content=2023-08-17T00%3A05%3A49&utm_source=twcnnbrk&utm_medium=social The facade of gender identity is failing our students ELIZABETH GRACE MATTHEW, 2023 https://thehill.com/opinion/education/4115665-the-facade-of-gender-identity-is-failing-our-students/ "Think of the Children” has become a dangerous dog whistle for regressive ideas (2022) https://www.highlandernews.org/84311/think-of-the-children-has-become-a-dangerous-dog-whistle-for-regressive-ideas/ Biden's Title IX changes mean this locker room horror is coming to a school near you (Brewer, 2023) https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/bidens-title-ix-changes-locker-room-horror-school The Impact of Title IX (Barbara Winslow) https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/impact-title-ix Courage Is A Habit Data Mining Your Child: What You Can Do To Stop It https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qYYvVo5T8jDsxdtYgOYEdoa3s5I-HmHa/view?usp=drivesdk Courage Is A Habit SEL Bloodline https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F2LwsweGWb6YgoO6I-M71XyOPQqfG3t3/view?usp=drivesdk SEL Surveys https://courageisahabit.org/#selsurveys Chapter 117 – Maine https://trackbill.com/bill/maine-legislative-document-394-resolve-regarding-legislative-review-of-chapter-117-rule-regarding-the-duties-of-school-counselors-and-school-social-workers-a-major-substantive-rule-of-the-department-of-education/2347048/ Maine LD 1735 https://legislature.maine.gov/LawMakerWeb/summary.asp?ID=280073944 Louisiana HB 466 https://legiscan.com/LA/bill/HB466/2023 Missouri SB 39 https://senate.mo.gov/23info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=44496 Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria: Parent Reports on 1655 Possible Cases Diaz S, Bailey JM. Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria: Parent Reports on 1655 Possible Cases. Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Apr;52(3):1031-1043. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02576-9. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Retraction in: Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Jun 14;: PMID: 36991212; PMCID: PMC10102036.

The film that has been taking America by storm, ‘Sound of Freedom’, has amassed tremendous support from its viewers along with backlash among legacy media. Based on and inspired by the operations of Tim Ballard, a former Department of Homeland Security agent who rescued many children from sex slavery, this powerful and emotional film unravels a tragic story of two children who were forced into the child sex market. The movie serves as a compelling exposé, shedding light to what has long been around us but largely turned a blind eye to – the war on children. Engulfed by its raw story telling, I was moved deeply in a way I never was before. Prior to watching this film, I recognized that child sex trafficking and the pornography industry are major issues in the world but failed to see how pervasive they were in our everyday life until the film brought the issue close to home. The US is the largest consumer of child pornography and the demand only continues to grow. According to the Demand Project, this problem is growing faster than any other criminal act with a 2,500% increase in arrests for child pornography over the last decade. According to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, 17.3 million images and videos of suspected child pornography were viewed in 2011. This is quadruple the amount that was recorded just four years earlier in 2007. Consuming child pornography is much more common than we would like to think. Therefore, it is essential to consider that perhaps the very people that we know may be engulfed by child pornography. It is also equally essential to consider that as a result of this growing trend, a discrete pedophilic agenda is all around us and we must remain vigilant. The proliferation of pedophilic propaganda has been successful because the war on children is carried out in discreteness and hides behind multiple disguises. This pedophilic spirit is rampant and lively, spreads like a virus, and latches itself into other social movements disguised as activism. The latest examples being “LGBTQ+ rights”, “Trans rights”, drag queen story hour, and the “gender affirming care” movement. Because its spread is subtle and hides behind a positive cause, it fools well-meaning individuals into supporting ideas that actually exploit minors. This pedophilic agenda is also successful because it weaponizes terms such as “homophobic” and “transphobic” to destroy anyone who can point out its influence. We can all learn from the works of Tim Ballard. Doing so allows us to see the bigger picture and examine the extent to which sexual exploitation influences culture. Its seeds have trickled into every aspect of society, including LGB and T culture. Gays Against Groomers has dedicated itself in the past year to waking up our community to the child abuse and pedophilic behavior that radical queer and trans ideology encourages – eroding sexual boundaries and taking advantage of children's innocence. THE PEDOPHILE DOCTRINE Tim Ballard extensively studied the literature of the Dutch Party for Neighborly Love, Freedom, and Diversity, a pro-pedophile political party, and discovered what he calls “The Pedophile Network Doctrines”. In an interview with The Daily Signal, Tim Ballard breaks down these doctrines. “They include things like: (1) separate children from parents, because parents are a bad influence, the state knows best; (2) sexualize kids, let them see pornography; (3) take God out of education because that just gets in the way; and (4) kids consent, consent, consent. Children can consent to anything.” said Ballard. “Now, what am I seeing here? My stomach is getting sick as I’m reading this. I read this every day. It’s the woke Left agenda. I'm not saying that they are colluding or talking, it doesn't matter it’s the same dark source. Pedophiles are sitting back right now going: we’ve been pushing this agenda for decades and now we don't have to push it anymore because the Left is taking care of it for us in America.” he exclaimed. Can you think of obvious examples of these doctrines flourishing under “LGBTQ+ progress?" 1. Separate children from parents, the state knows best. The recent push for California bill AB 957, in which the state could make a decision about parental custody by taking a parent's affirmation (or lack thereof) about their child’s chosen gender into account, is a prime example. 2. Sexualize kids, let them see pornography. Recently on July 29, 2023, at a Wisconsin “All Ages Pride Event”, GAG protested drag queen story hour for children who flaunted provocative short dresses, fish nets, and high heels. A member of Brew City Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence paced back and forth around children wearing sexually revealing clothing and kink-inspired accessories such as a cat collar and leash around her neck. Although it is not direct pornography, it is directly desensitizing children into thinking this is normal and appropriate. 3. Take God out of education. Teaching about God in schools is a debatable topic. But we are making generations of LGB and T individuals believe that God does not welcome them when that is far from the truth. We need an active pursuit of spirituality to eradicate this dark force. 4. Children can consent to anything. In the same interview, Ballard added, “This whole trans ideology foist on children, what they’re saying is, children can consent to having their bodies filled with a chemical that will destroy their reproductive system. They can consent to ripping apart their genitalia. Like, this is insanity—in and of itself it’s horrible. But what it’s going to lead to is what the pedophiles have been asking for. If you can consent to that, guess what? What’s more fluid than gender? Age.” FIGHTING THE ROOT CAUSE The unexpected blockbuster hit ‘Sound of Freedom’ is a movie with a tremendous impact no one saw coming. While its critics accuse the film of misrepresenting human trafficking, having ties to QAnon conspiracies, and being too “sensational," this work of art continues to wake up (or “unwoke”) our country. In order to defeat the despicable perversions that have gained prominence in radical queer activism, we must explore and support the works of others who protect children, such as Tim Ballard and GAG. Although Ballard and GAG fight the war on children from different angles, we must see the connections between our works and recognize that a crucial part of this multifaceted fight is destroying the root cause of these wars: sex trafficking and the pornography industry, the silent epidemics of the world. Pornography fuels sex trafficking operations. It destroys marriages and relationships, it continuously distorts and corrupts the minds of millions of men, women, and children. Pornography has no respectable place in our society. We must bring forth discussions and awareness on this visual and destructive opioid. We must pledge to never again consume the grime that porn entices us with for the sake of ourselves, sex trafficking victims, for the preservation of the gay community, and generations to come. We must consider how this has shaped the way we have conversations about these issues and the programming behind it. These industries did not reach heights of power overnight. It took decades of slow sexual infiltration to collectively groom individuals to form society as we know it today. Perhaps that is why well-meaning people cannot conceptualize the filth that Gays Against Groomers so rigidly rejects. Perhaps they have been conditioned by these industries to accept porn in children’s “LGBTQ+” books. Perhaps it is why no attendee of the Wisconsin “All Ages Pride Event” questioned the Brew Sister of Perpetual Indulgence’s inappropriate attire for the event other than the protestors. We must break free from decades of collective grooming. We must be courageous in exposing the sexual deviancies that quietly walk around us, despite its repercussions. And until we eradicate these vicious industries, generations of American children will continue to be victimized and destroyed, including those who view radical activist communities as a “safe space." Sources: https://thedemandproject.org/statistics/ https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/06/28/transgender-movement-biden-border-policy-aid-abet-child-sex-slavery-tim-ballard-warns https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB957

There have been many articles and videos floating around on the internet since bill 5599 passed in Washington state this past spring. Those leaning to the farthest side of the left paint the bill as a way to save transgender children from homelessness after being kicked out into the streets by their parents. Those to the most extreme side of the far-right paint it as the FBI kicking down doors and kidnapping children. Rather than quoting articles written about the bill or sharing my own personal opinions, we’re going to be looking into the bill itself as well as the official website for the Department of Children, Youth and Families. The Department of Children, Youth and Families is responsible for runaway youth and those in foster care. They oversee all issues relating to custody of the children as stated in the bill. This bill was passed in the state of Washington in April of 2023 and is currently in effect. Section one expresses that there is an abundance of homeless transgender youth and quotes statistics found by the Trevor Project, which is an activist group known for its work in making puberty blockers, cross sex hormones and sex change surgeries accessible to children. Their statistics are taken from qualitative surveys that are usually biased, inconclusive, and lack concrete statistical significance. Organization leaders from Gays Against Groomers have spoken to The Trevor Project multiple times over the past year to discuss our concerns with how they view child safeguarding (or lack thereof). They know exactly who we are. Rumor has it they don't like us very much. The feeling is mutual. Section one ends by stating that barriers are to be removed so that minors who are seeking protected health care services, including “gender affirming care”, are allowed access to youth shelters or temporary licensed accommodations. At first glance, it seems that this bill is intended to help transgender kids who have been thrown out into streets and are unwanted by their parents, but it also allows children in stable home environments to run away from their parents to seek out “gender affirming care." This bill allows children to seek accommodation at any licensed organization with a stated mission to provide services to homeless or runaway youth and their families as well as host homes and shelters. It’s important to note the definition of “shelter” listed in this bill. The bill states, “'Shelter' means the person's home or any structure over which the person has any control” as the definition. The bill fails to list off a decent set standards or safeguards to ensure that the runaway children end up in a safe environment. This leaves children extremely vulnerable to ill-intentioned adults such as pedophiles or sex traffickers. The procedures listed for contacting the parents of the runaway youth are extremely vague, as well. It states that the accommodating shelter may withhold all information on the minor from the parents if there is compelling reason to withhold. This means that rather than contacting the parents, the department is contacted instead, even if the parents report the child as a missing person. There are two scenarios listed as “compelling reasons” that allow the licensed accommodation to withhold information on minors from the parents. The first one listed is when a minor is being subjected to abuse or neglect at home. That one should absolutely be supported but was already allowed before this bill existed. The next line states that the shelter can withhold information on the minor if they are seeking protected health care services. They specifically define protected health care services as “gender affirming treatment” in this bill. Gender affirming treatment is what they use to describe things like puberty blockers, cross sex hormones and sex change surgeries. The fact that they placed seeking gender affirming treatment right next to abuse and neglect in the bill says a lot. If "gender-affirming care" is classified as lifesaving and necessary under the law, then one could make the case that parents who don't go along with it are unsafe and unfit to care for their own child. The Department of Youth, Children and Families is the department mentioned all throughout this bill. This is the department that will eventually assign a case worker to your child after they have run away. The typical process listed on their website for deciding whether or not you can reclaim custody of your child after a CPS referral has been made estimates an 18 month process in and out of court rooms. It can take longer in some cases, especially considering the fact that they are understaffed and overflowing with children as is. There is no protocol listed specifically for parents who’s child fled because they refused to provide the child with cross sex hormones or to undergo sex change procedures. According to the bill, the department is supposed to help resolve conflict between the family if possible, but it doesn’t describe or define what that means at all. If you look through the resources they provide for youth in foster care on their website, The Trevor Project, PFLAG, Human Rights Campaign and the National Center for Transgender Equality are what they have listed. Regarding minors in the foster care system, they state “Apple Health Core Connections (AHCC) is your health care plan. AHCC is able to assist you in accessing LGBTQIA+ services including counseling and medical treatment that meet your needs.” (LGBTQIA+ Youth in Washington State Foster Care) This means that your child will have the insurance coverage and everything else needed to start medically transitioning while you spend what could take well over a year fighting to reclaim custody of your own son or daughter. Whether or not you get your child back at all is heavily dependent on your child’s case worker and the department. The department is explicitly and unapologetically in support of youth having access to what they call “gender affirming care”. They advertise the fact that LGBTQ+ medical care is covered by the insurance that they provide to the children in their care and express an obvious bias towards medically transitioning the sex of children in their care. The leader of GAG's Washington chapter testified against this bill, but it unfortunately wound up passing. If a parent disagrees with their child taking hormones or getting surgeries that permanently alter their bodies, the government may now be put in charge for deciding whether or not these parents are safe enough to know the whereabouts of their children. It strips away parents' rights and hands them over to the state. Not only are children allowed to run away, but they are also provided with insurance, shelter, and the bodily autonomy to transition with little safeguarding. Children are too young to consent to these procedures. Any policy that grants minors such bodily autonomy over their reproductive anatomy should not be embraced if we truly care about the health, safety, and well-being of children. We expect to see more of these dangerous policies being proposed in states that have not banned child transition (yet). And we are going to fight them with everything we have in order to put a stop to this madness once and for all. For more information or to read the bill yourself, visit the following link: https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2023-24/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/Senate/5599-S.SL.pdf?q=20230801210809.

Books can be anything, from a tool for learning to an escape through the imagination. Unfortunately, they can also contain propaganda designed to shape impressionable young minds who don’t know how to question what they’re being told just yet. Gender ideology is not only harmful to gay people, but confusing and overwhelming children across the world. These are new concepts that extremists are pushing through any form of media they can, including books, most of which are sold on Amazon. These concepts not only erase what it means to be gay, but sexually activate young children by introducing them to mature content they may not be ready for yet. As a result, children may exhibit premature addictive sexualized behavior and find themselves in dangerous situations that could damage their psyche for life (or worse).Here are 11 titles that all parents need to be aware of: 1. Gender Queer (Graphic Novel) Marketed to 18+, Gender Queer, along with a handful of others on this list, has been exposed in several schools around the country due to its graphic illustrations of a teenage girl with penis envy who experiments with binders and strap ons. The story depicts the character experiencing severe gender dysphoria, fear of her own body, and incestual conversations about masturbating. We’re sad that ‘Gender Queer’ distorts what it means to be a female and doesn’t teach readers how to love themselves as they are. This book does NOT belong in school libraries, but unfortunately that’s where it’s being found. 2. The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish Swish Swish Marketed to literal infants (1+), this strange children’s book can be found being read by Drag Queens all over YouTube, including the author. Traditionally referred to as female impersonators, Drag Queens were once exclusively adult entertainers who made sexual jokes during provocative performances. We can’t for the life of us figure out why they suddenly want to read to exclusively children. We don’t see them at nursing homes or adult rec centers trying to entertain those who need it most, instead we see too many adults justifying why a man dressed as an exaggerated woman is the pinnacle of uniqueness that all children should admire. We’ve seen enough episodes of RuPaul’s Drag Race to know most Drag Queens aren’t exactly role models for anyone, much less children. Y’all are a mess. Why are you so desperate to appeal to minors? 3. This Book is Gay Another title being found in school libraries, This Book is Gay is marketed to 14-17 year olds, and discusses gay sex in graphic details with illustrations included. Chapter 9 of the book is titled: “The Ins and Outs of Gay Sex.” But even more worrying than the pornographic explanations are the instructions on how to use sex apps. Despite the safety disclaimer which is obviously present to legally cover the authors butt, teenage readers are given explicit instructions on how to use apps to find strangers for sex. We shouldn’t have to explain why it’s dangerous for a 15-year-old to find this book and potentially end up in a vehicle with a full-grown adult who should know better. 4. In My Daddy’s Belly Supposedly in its pre-order stage, this book claims to be “appropriate for kids of all ages” and supports the idea that men can give birth. We strongly disagree, and so has humanity for its entire existence up until very recent years. We submit that if an adult wishes to appear and exist as a man, then said adult would relinquish all female functions due to the intense dysphoria it would cause to use them. Confusing for both adults and kids alike, this book completely distorts what a female is and takes the magic out of the miracle of childbirth to claim that anyone can do it. Because women can’t have anything anymore. This is lesbian erasure. This is being straight with extra steps. Just...no. 5. The Every Body Book Claiming to be aimed at children ages 8-12, ‘The Every Body Book’ capitalizes on the neo-ideology to warp young minds into believing that gender and sex are different, and you can be whatever you want to be despite your innate biology. Covering a wide range of topics, the book brags about using “gender-neutral language” and quotes specialists who think it’s a wonderful tool to teach kids about multiple personalities—oops, we mean identities, and incorporates racial diversities to ensure all kids know how to be nice to anyone who believes in the same pseudo-religious doctrine this book is pushing. Again, the concepts within this book are brand new to society, and there is absolutely no way the entire world will accept them because they contradict common sense and weaken already vulnerable people. 6. Flamer (Graphic Novel) Aimed at 14-17 year olds, Flamer is another title being found in school libraries depicting gay sex and sexual abuse. In addition to explicit sexual situations depicting minors, Flamer also depicts self-harm, internalized homophobia, offensive religious commentary and has been added to many LGBT reading lists. We can appreciate the representation of the journey of being gay, but this book does not belong in schools for young children. After TPUSA reported finding this graphic novel in a Tempe, AZ Elementary School district, the book was removed from their database. [source] Why was it there in the first place? 7. Bye Bye Binary Another children’s book supposedly for infants 1+, ‘Bye Bye Binary’ encourages parents to “break gender norms” by (gasp here) letting their child enjoy things. Newsflash: gay people have been breaking gender stereotypes for decades! Pink was once a color for boys in the Victorian era! Despite its intentions, this book solidifies dated gender norms from the 1950’s and reassures parents that it’s normal to ignore your child’s gender for years so they can choose it themselves by picking up a toy truck or a doll. The cover depicts a baby with an almost vengeful expression, as if it's aware of gender theory at the fresh age of 14 months. We doubt that. 8. Beyond Magenta Aimed at 14-17 year olds, Beyond Magenta is a concerning book about “teenage transgenders,” telling tales of gender dysphoric minors who sometimes described themselves as “sexually mature children.” These minors often talk about hiding their behavior from parents, running away from home, and sexually experimenting as young as six years old. Some teens in the book describe themselves as “non-binary,” a new concept that enforces gender binary and stereotypes while enabling a sense of victimhood under a system that no longer exists. ‘Beyond Magenta’ was listed in 2015 as the fourth-most banned book in the United States due to its anti-family sentiments and described sex acts of minors. Some activists say the book normalizes pedophilia. We don’t think anyone under 18 should read this book, and we’ve seen it removed from several school libraries already. 9. It Feels Good To Be Yourself: A Book About Gender Identity Yet another title that capitalizes on the new and confusing doctrine of gender ideology, ‘It Feels Good To Be Yourself’ is aimed at children 4+. The tagline says: “Some people are boys. Some people are girls. Some people are both, neither, or somewhere in between.” This book has the audacity to call this a “sweet, straightforward explanation of gender identity” while pushing the idea that children can betray their bodies and be whatever they want, even nothing at all. In the process, this book erases what it means to be gay. This is clearly propaganda designed to install a very specific vocabulary into the new generation. 10. ‘Twas the Night Before Pride An obvious ploy to solidify Pride as a religious holiday among LGBTQ+ zealots, ‘Twas the Night Before Pride’ is marketed to children ages 4-8 and attempts to simplify the serious hardships of gay people for kids. But do 4-8 year olds really need to know about Stonewall or AIDS? Does reducing these concepts for kids really help gay people or make kids nicer? We don’t think so. This just so happens to be one of the books Drag Queens insist on reading to children. It’s just not necessary. 11. A Kids Book About Pronouns Finally, this children’s book written by a so-called “trauma psychologist” with they/them pronouns teaches kids 5+ about “dismantling the gender binary” with pronouns never used in human history. According to gender-confused author Dr. Courtney Wells, it’s important to push these concepts on kids AND adults to make them uncomfortable until they submit to your demands. It’s unfortunate that Wells and her wife Lee have taken to erasing lesbian culture and traumatizing children with confusing rhetoric that turns their sense of self into a fluid and easily manipulated state. But hey, get that money, ladies! If you need a therapist with over 20 years of experience who knows how therapists are being programmed to spread this propaganda, visit our friend Pam at her substack here.

In just one week, RADAR has skyrocketed, and our work has already received attention in the media. We would like to thank all of our readers for supporting our mission to end the war on children. This week, our Communications Director and RADAR journalist, Judith Rose, was asked to appear on One America News Network to discuss her latest expose on the pedophilic roots of the transgender movement. It went viral and became our most-viewed article within the first 24 hours. She informed OANN's viewers of the truth about the colors of transgender flag – baby blue and baby pink. Given what we have learned about how gender ideology negatively impacts children over the past year, we speculate that this was not an accident. "The creator of the trans flag was a very disturbed individual who seemed to have a case of autogynephilia, which not enough people talk about. It's the sexual arousal at the idea or act of dressing as the opposite sex and going into their spaces. It's a fetish. The community really needs to examine that under a microscope because the root of all of it is perversion. And a lot of the groundwork has been laid by sexologists who pushed for pro-pedophilic laws in the 1960s and 1970s. The goal is to liberate youth from their parents and be able to consent to adult relationships." A lot of people are unaware of this, and they are always shocked when they realize what these colors might actually represent. It is highly disturbing that this flag has become normalized so quickly in such a short amount of time. And we also think that it is important for the gay adults who support our activism to have solid evidence and make their own decisions about whether or not they appreciate these colors being added to our flag. If it wasn't obvious, the inventor of the Progress Flag is not even gay. Many are skeptical when they first encountered it because it is no gay man would come up with something so unappealing. It is not an attractive flag design whatsoever. The Progress Pride flag was developed in 2018 by non-binary American artist and designer Daniel Quasar (who uses xe/xyr pronouns). The Progress Flag does not actually represent gay people. It is a far-left symbol that is used to virtue signal about social justice "progressivism." We completely reject this flag being used to represent anyone. Judith also discussed Florida's recent Title IX policies, which binarize the law on the basis of sex for school sports and spaces. When "gender identity" is added as a subcategory of "sex," then this allows girls to get undressed in a school locker room full of boys without parental knowledge or consent. Female locker rooms were placed in schools in order to ensure privacy and keep kids safe. "This is about children's safety ... These radicals have gone so extreme … I think it's great. It [the new rules that Florida has adopted] keeps everybody safe. I do hope to see more school districts doing this ... Many of these extremists believe that they can do no wrong. A lot of them come across as extremely unstable." Activists have adopted the belief that this somehow erases trans people. But that could not be further from the truth. Such Title IX regulations ensure parental rights and child safeguarding. This should not be controversial, but trans activism has taken a dark turn in recent years and put the rights of others in jeopardy. We feel like it is important to discuss these issues from within the community, because other prominent figures have been canceled, even for just asking questions. For example, the day before Judith appeared on OANN, singer and songwriter, Ne-Yo, was canceled for stating his opinion on sterilizing children. His publicist shortly retracted the statement. However, Ne-Yo was brave enough to issue a correction and reaffirm his stance on child mutilation. He posted a video, saying "If my opinion offended somebody...yeah sure, I apologize for you being offended because that wasn't my intention. My intention is never to hurt anybody." He made it very clear that he will never be okay with allowing a child to do something that detrimental to their life, at an age where they cannot make such permanent decisions. Ne-Yo clarifies that he plans on educating himself about this topic. The people accusing Ne-Yo of being anti-trans should educate themselves. Nearly 100 studies have been added to RADAR in order to make this as easy as possible. You can check them out at https://www.radar.gaysagainstgroomers.com/posts/categories/studies. Our team has been working night and day to get this malpractice banned in as many states as possible. It is something that we are passionate about because there is no sound evidence that this is the best way to help a child who is struggling with gender incongruence. In The United States, boys and girls are currently being injected with triptorelin -- the same drug used to chemically castrate people who assault children (Sloan et al., 2017). This is no longer being carried out in many countries across Europe. They've recently started pumping the brakes on this process because it is experimental and there is not enough evidence backing up the notion that this is "lifesaving health care." In fact, a recent study out of Denmark, one of the pioneers of this malpractice, found that the participants who received hormones and/or surgery did not have lower rates of suicide attempts. However, Ne-Yo has been criticized of opposing "lifesaving health care for trans kids." They also found that there has been a sharp increase in the rates of adolescent girls seeking transition over the past decade. In the USA, this started in 2013, when WPATH eased the restrictions for children to transition. Many studies note a clear social contagion amongst adolescent girls who have never showed signs of gender dysphoria until they became involved in friend groups with multiple "trans kids" in them. A lot of these girls grew up to become lesbian or bisexual women who were just confused during puberty and uncomfortable with the way their body started to develop (2023). In one study, almost 9 in 10 young people questioning their gender seemed to be subject to social influence. 86.7% of the young people in Lisa Littman’s 2018 study [1] belonged to a friend group where one or more friends came out as trans at the same time, and/or had an increase in their use of social media. Social contagion – the involuntary “catching” of behaviors and attitudes across connected individuals is a well-accepted phenomenon in psychological literature. It is well-documented that adolescents — and females in particular — are prone to social contagion effects, from cutting [4] to eating disorders [5]. Social network analyses suggest that peer contagion underlies the influence of friendship on obesity, unhealthy body images, and expectations. Upon further investigation, we noticed that Ne-Yo's critics seem very misinformed about what is going on. The American Academy of Pediatrics has decided to do a review of the available data for transitioning children. Even PinkNews, a British LGBTQIA+ news website, criticized him, even though their country has very recently halted child transition, upon discovering that it causes brain swelling in young children who still believe in The Tooth Fairy. We hope that more people become comfortable with speaking out against doing this to children. The more people who speak out, the quicker it will be prohibited. When Gays Against Groomers gets this outlawed on a national level, the people who defended it are going to be embarrassed of how ignorant they were to the truth. We would like to thank OANN for allowing us to discuss what our organization stands for on a national level. And we look forward to speaking with them again in the future about these pressing issues. Watch Judith's appearance here: REFERENCES [1] Littman, L. (2018). Rapid-onset gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults: A study of parental reports. PLOS ONE, 13 (8). [2] Levy, D. A., & Nail, P. R. (1993). Contagion: A theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 119 (2): 233-284. [3] Burgess, L.G., Riddell, P.M., Fancourt, A. & Murayama, K. (2018). The Influence of Social Contagion Within Education: A Motivational Perspective. Mind, Brain, and Education 12: 164-174. [4] Hermansson-Webb, E. B. (2014). ‘With Friends Like These…’: The Social Contagion of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Amongst Adolescent Females. Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy: University of Otago. [5] Allison, S., Warin, M. & Bastiampillai, T. (2013). Anorexia nervosa and social contagion: Clinical implications. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 48 (2): 116-120. [6] Dishion, T. J., & Tipsord, J. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual review of psychology 62: 189–214. [6] https://www.radar.gaysagainstgroomers.com/post/spilling-the-tea-on-the-t-the-pedophilic-roots-of-the-trans-movement [7] https://twitter.com/againstgrmrs/status/1690078487946674177?t=1uHRE9myk_MZX24QhlsXLw&s=19 [8] https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/08/08/ne-yo-retracts-apology-controversial-comments-trans-children/ [9] https://www.radar.gaysagainstgroomers.com/posts/categories/studies [10] https://segm.org/transgender_suicide_mortailty_Denmark [11] https://www.radar.gaysagainstgroomers.com/post/gays-against-groomers-public-comment-to-the-biden-administration-s-proposed-title-ix-amendments [12] https://www.radar.gaysagainstgroomers.com/post/gays-against-groomers-public-comment-on-the-proposed-changes-to-title-ix-regulations

"The Queer Trans (QT) Project," a trans and queer organization out of Jacksonville, Florida has made it very clear that they are fighting for the civil right to sterilize children. Their founder testified against an anti-child mutilation bill that Gays Against Groomers helped put into law, in accordance to the Florida Dept of Health's Board of Medicine's Standards of Practice for the Treatment of Gender Dysphoria in Minors. The law wound up passing, in our favor. But that didn't stop child mutilation advocates from getting themselves into more trouble. A few months later, the founder of the QT Project, Cielo Sunsarae, was rejected for a job as lifeguard after her breasts were allegedly exposed in front of children at an aquatic center. This followed complaints from horrified parents of children who saw the incident during a training exercise in a pool shared with dozens of children (Pitts, 2023). "The Queer Trans (QT) Project" has come under fire for mailing inappropriate packages to children. According to their mission statement, "We are a black-led and trans-led organization on a mission to provide gender-empowering resources to LGBTQ+ individuals all across the world so that they have the power and confidence to create social change in their communities." The Queer Trans (QT) Project advertises these "gender-empowering resources'' or Build-A-Queer Kits to an audience of tens of thousands of children on Tiktok. These kits are discreetly mailed to "trans children'' filled with gender-affirming gifts like condoms, chest binders, and FtM packers. UNACCEPTABLE. According to queertransproject.org, "Our organization has provided over $90,000 worth of gender-affirming kits, ensuring that everyone has access to the resources they need. Our discreet 'packaging' ensures a safe and private experience for recipients, fostering an environment of trust and support." $90,000 Where would they get that kind of money? Well, their website asserts that The QT Project is "Fiscally sponsored by the American Trans Resource Hub, 501(c)(3) tax-deductible nonprofit organization." American Trans Resource Hub (ATRH) is a transgender rights non-profit organization "FOR Trans People BY Trans People." They have a Free Binder Program BY Trans Adults, FOR underaged girls. It gives minors (aged 13+) step-by-step instructions on how to get grown adults to mail them breast binders in discreet packaging, ensuring that parents are kept in the dark about what strange adults are sending their children. Chest binders (Peitzmeier et al., 2017) are very tight and flatten the breasts so harshly that they can cause lung damage (Cumming et al., 2016). Breast binding is NO JOKE. These devices are linked to health issues (Poteat et al., 2018) including chest pain (30%), becoming light-headed (30%), shortness of breath (49%), and back pain (65%). A lot of health issues from binding tend to show up over time, so there is not much information known about the severity. A 2021 survey of 1,800 females who bind their breasts found that they contribute to bad posture, rib fracture, spinal deformity, overheating, swelling, skin changes, scarring, skin infections, and they alters the healthy breasts of teenage girls. A lot of these young girls who get caught up in the chest binding craze go on to medicalize their bodies, resulting in infertility and cardiovascular malfunction (Alzahrani et al., 2019). Did Gays Against Groomers outlaw child sex changes in your state? If you still want to give these drugs to children, The American Trans Resource Hub has you covered. They have an interactive Provider Map so children can search for their nearest hormone distributor. States like Oregon provide hormone injections without parental awareness as young as 15. We cannot find a solid explanation for why The Queer Trans Project's "trans self-defense kits" were discontinued. But it was rather concerning to hear that these discreet packages contained pepper spray, knives, tasers, and coloring books…all secretly sent over to your daughter, free of charge (Gress, 2023). "Protect Trans Kids by mailing weapons to their house!" said no rational person ever. If organizations like The Queer Trans (QT) Project call you a bigot, do yourself a favor and take it as a compliment. You will never be on the wrong side of history standing up against this level of depravity. REFERENCES How to Transition Without Your Parent’s Knowledge With the Free ‘Build-A-Queer’ Kit for Minors, Which Includes Weapons for Self-Defence [Brandes Gress, August 10 2023] https://thenetworthof.com/how-to-transition-without-your-parents-knowledge-with-the-free-build-a-queer-kit-for-minors-which-includes-weapons-for-self-defence/ Build-A-Queer Kits https://queertransproject.org/pages/build-a-queer-kits Alzahrani, T., Nguyen, T., Ryan, A., Dwairy, A., McCaffrey, J., Yunus, R., Forgione, J., Krepp, J., Nagy, C., Mazhari, R., & Reiner, J. (2019). Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Myocardial Infarction in the Transgender Population. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005597 American Trans Resource Hub Gender Affirming-Care Provider Map https://www.atrh.org/providermap The QT Project https://queertransproject.org/ Transgender lifeguard rejected after showing breasts at aquatic center (Pitts, 2023) https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1766460/Transgender-lifeguard-rejected-showing-breasts#comments-wrapper American Trans Resource Hub https://www.atrh.org/ American Trans Resource Hub Provider Map https://www.atrh.org/providermap Free Binder Program (American Trans Resource Hub) https://www.atrh.org/binder-program Cumming, R., Sylvester, K. & Fuld, J.P. (2016). Understanding the effects on lung function of chest binder use in the transgender population. Thorax 71. Peitzmeier, S., Gardner, I., Weinand, J., Corbet A. & Acevedo, K. (2017). Health impact of chest binding among transgender adults: a community-engaged, cross-sectional study. Culture, Health & Sexuality 19 (1): 64-75. [2017] Peitzmeier, S.M., Silberholz, J., Gardner, I.H., Weinand, J. & Acevedo, K. (2021). Time to First Onset of Chest Binding-Related Symptoms in Transgender Youth. Pediatrics 147 (3). Poteat, T., Malik, M., & Cooney, E. (2018). Understanding the health effects of binding and tucking for gender affirmation. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2 (Suppl 1), 76. Standards of Practice for the Treatment of Gender Dysphoria in Minors – Rule: 64B8-9.019; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; Board of Medicine; https://www.flrules.org/gateway/RuleNo.asp?id=64B8-9.019 Protect Trans Kids (ATRH) https://www.atrh.org/protect-trans-kids

The American Academy of Pediatrics has decided to do a review of the available data for transitioning children. We hope to see a sharp turn in the way The United States goes about pursuing gender medicine. If there's one thing that sane people can agree on, it's that no child should be put through something as invasive as a phalloplasty. No excuses. We will never let everyone forget that it was completely and totally okay to perform child sex changes (LA HB648, 2023) in the state of Louisiana before we stepped in. How could we not? What kind of lunatic would try to make the case that attaching a Frankenweiner to a teenage girl is EVER a good idea? How many more children are going to be put through this before the people in charge admit that they were wrong? It is shocking that trans activists claim to be the good guys while simultaneously fighting to do THIS to your daughters: We are confident that the AAP will make the right decision and ditch the idea that this is health care. It is nothing but a medical scandal that was engineered by gender ideology: a tyrannical hate-cult that gives adults permission to experiment on children's bodies. We predict that some professionals at the AAP will try to make the case that a national ban is "too restrictive." But we always make sure to be as up-front as possible, and the work we've put in clearly states what side we are on. They had proof that a social contagion was sterilizing gay teenagers and inflicting early-onset osteoporosis. And liars like Charles Clymer, from the HRC publicly defended that this wasn't even happening, but the data said otherwise. In 2019 one study alone recruited "49 male-to-female and 67 female-to-male gender dysphoric adolescents treated with triptorelin." Triptorelin is used by endocrinologists to chemically castrate PEDOPHILES (Sloan et al., 2017). Research reports from 2010 outright stated that "Various treatments have been used to manage sex offenders with varying success. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, such as triptorelin, a depot injection, cause castration-equivalent testosterone levels in men and are emerging as an effective treatment option in cases of severe paraphilia." It noted that this is most commonly used on pedophiles (Saleem, 2010). Another study on GnRH-analogues collected data from 70 gender-confused teenagers. Teachers and corrupt counselors are encouraging parents to inject these drugs into their children. Those who disagreed were labeled as bigots. That should terrify you. Gender-affirming care views children as objects that can be purchased. From "birthing people" to "cervix haver," the way they refer to children's bodies is peak dehumanization. At the end of the day, either child sexual reassignment surgery "isn't happening" or it is "necessary health care." Both cannot be true at once. In fact, if pediatric sex changes aren't happening, then putting a national ban on it won't change anything. The mere success of our movement alone proves that it is happening. If doctors weren't mutilating the bodies of minors, then there wouldn't be a reason for gays to organize and get it outlawed. Remember that. REFERENCES Gender Inclusive Language (California) http://www.phsa.ca/transcarebc/Documents/HealthProf/Gender_Inclusive_Language_Clinical.pdf Pediatrician’s Group to Review Guidelines for Treatment of ‘Trans’ Youth https://townhall.com/tipsheet/madelineleesman/2023/08/04/american-academy-of-pediatrics-trans-youth-n2626635 American Academy of Pediatrics Speaks Out Against Bills Harming Transgender Youth https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/news-releases/aap/2021/american-academy-of-pediatrics-speaks-out-against-bills-harming-transgender-youth/ Joseph, Tobin, Ting, Joanna and Butler, Gary. "The effect of GnRH analogue treatment on bone mineral density in young adolescents with gender dysphoria: findings from a large national cohort" Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 10, 2019, pp. 1077-1081. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2019-0046 Unfavorable Results and Complications in Phalloplasty Surgery https://plasticsurgerykey.com/unfavorable-results-and-complications-in-phalloplasty-surgery/ Gays Against Groomers (@againstgrmrs) https://twitter.com/againstgrmrs/status/1666993528755433472?s=20 Charlotte Clymer Lies About Pediatric Transgender Surgeries https://twitter.com/cmclymer/status/1364996676071481354?s=20 Human Rights Campaign: Supreme Court Must Reject Taxpayer-Funded Discrimination (Clymer, 2020) https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/human-rights-campaign-supreme-court-must-reject-taxpayer-funded-discriminat Images from The Inquirer: Gender-affirming care has a long history in the U.S. — and not just for transgender people https://www.inquirer.com/health/gender-affirming-care-history-20230404.html?outputType=amp Phalloplasty: The dream and the reality https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901910/