Search Results

Dr. Sidhbh Gallagher: The Modern Mengele Butchering Your Teenage Daughters One of the most well-known surgeons who operates on children under the guise of “gender affirming care” is Dr. Sidhbh Gallagher. She is recognized as both a renegade in her field and a human rights disaster in the making. Dr. Gallagher is infamous for her social media content, which misguides children into thinking that their bodies are wrong and should consider surgical interventions. Dr. Gallagher recruits adolescent customers by glamorizing the surgical experience. By telling these children that they are born in the wrong body and therefore a member of a marginalized demographic, she is able to convince these kids that they have a gender identity misalignment (that did not exist until they gained access to social media). The way that activists like Dr. Gallagher talk about “transgender kids'' is similar to how one may talk about racial groups, sexual orientation, populations defined by immutable characteristics, using both quantitative and qualitative data in order to measure characteristics in these populations. “Transgender” does not work the same way. Since gender is socially constructed, the way it manifests in our culture is completely dependent on the way that society views gender norms. Unlike the gay/lesbian population, which is measurable and cross-culturally remains consistent over time, gender-diverse populations manifest based on the sociocultural norms that change over time. It is impossible to define a group of people based on a philosophical belief that has no basis in material reality. Similar to being straight, being LGB is something that you are. “Trans” is something that you do, whether that entails pursuing medical intervention or simply going off of self-identification. Two people may undergo medical interventions for completely unrelated reasons and barely have anything in common. A middle-aged male who pursues this treatment due to autogynephilic transvestism has a completely different reality and experience than a teenage girl on the autism spectrum who is unsure of their identity. In Iran, gay men are forced to undergo these procedures as a way to “convert” them, turning gay men into a transsexually-constructed medical victims, whose culture could not stand the fact that some men are more feminine and not interested in women. What we refer to as “transgender” takes different forms depending on societal context – it is currently being forced upon children. In actuality, “transgender” is a sociopolitical/ideological term that is attributed to various groups of people, based on the notion that their biological sex is irrelevant to their human existence. This creates a lot of confusion, especially when it comes to children. Perhaps the first mistake was turning a clinically-defined population into an identity group in the first place. Because of the way gender and gender roles operate, the “transgender” demographic is bound to change over time. Transgenderism in 2023 is nothing like it was back in the 1990s or 2000s. We have seen a recent, intense change in the types of people who seek hormones and surgeries. In just a few years, a clinical population of mostly adult males has switched to being mostly young females. There has been a recent 5,337% rise in adolescent girls identifying as trans over the last decade. Over the past three years, 1,130 procedures have been done on minors, nearly 800 of them being chest surgeries. Interestingly, Dr. Gallagher’s primary focus has been appealing to adolescent girls on social media. A plastic surgeon who once specialized in operating on adult males has adjusted to this demographic switch and is advertising accordingly. Reports from former (male) patients all show severe complications and the disastrous results are attributed to medical maltreatment. In 2020, she started focusing on young females and is getting more business than ever. She often gets questions about patients possibly regretting the surgery or being unsure as to whether or not the operation will benefit them. The answers she provides are misleading, to say the least. She claims that regretting these surgeries is extremely rare, since they are medically necessary procedures. However, she is basing her assertions on data collected before this recent explosion, citing data taken from adults (instead of children), and cannot honestly draw concrete conclusions about the current state of transsexualism because the data on this cohort has yet to be collected. Performing these procedures on minors is experimental. Guinea pigs are recruited through social media apps for children. She uses playful language to describe dangerous operations like double mastectomies on minors, referring to it as “yeeting the teets” or “teetus deletus.” She has proudly claimed that she has “yeeted hundreds of teets.” According to the New York Times, most of her patients are found through TikTok. There is evidence that she has surgically operated on thirteen-year-olds. Gender dysphoria causes a lot of discomfort and must be handled properly, with the patients’ health in mind. But her advertising method makes the whole process seem like a simple cosmetic procedure. She even advertises that nonbinary patients can have top surgery without re-attaching the nipples, in order to give a more “ambiguous look,” depending on how they want the results to appear. If these procedures are life-saving and medically necessary, then why is aesthetic and outward appearance being prioritized over the patients’ health? Nowadays, instead of getting professionally diagnosed and treated, one can obtain letters of support for “gender-affirming care” from services like Plume, which only require a virtual appointment and a $150.00 payment. A professional who actually cares about the health and well-being of gender dysphoric youth should probably consider the ramifications of such negligence. In 2017, Gallagher co-authored a study about online “gender confirmation resources,” which encouraged institutions to put out information about these procedures using simpler language so that a sixth grader could understand it: Increasing transgender health care coverage has resulted in easier access to gender confirmation surgery. Patients considering surgery consistently access medical information online to improve knowledge regarding surgical options, complications, recovery, and life after transitioning. As a result, national health institutes recommend that patient educational materials be written at a sixth-grade–reading level. The purpose of this study is to assess the complexity of online gender confirmation surgery information. A recent study conveys that Dr. Gallagher had performed over 300 (n = 306) mastectomies at the time of the study. Surgical complications included hematoma, infection, necrosis, and pneumothorax (collapsed lung). One patient decided to come forward and go public about their nightmarish experience with Dr. Gallagher. The patient received a $20,000 mastectomy and wound up with a hematoma and broken incision that was splitting open and had blood clots falling out of it. Upon informing Dr. Gallagher, she swept it off and said that it was not an emergency, not infected, and just needs some ointment. After weeks of being unable to move because of the pain, the patient went to the emergency room and needed corrective surgery, nearly going into septic shock. They are unable to sue the surgeon for performing a life-threatening surgery that nearly resulted in death, and it now costs an additional $102,547. According to WPATH (World Professional Association for Transgender Health), female patients are anywhere between 2.5 to 7.1 times more likely to initiate transgender care. WPATH has started to acknowledge the possibility of a social contagion among teenage girls, some sources citing social media and pornography as contributing factors. Dr. Marci Bowers, the president of WPATH, has warned against videos like Gallagher’s, claiming that this content might be grooming children into a psychic epidemic without proper understanding of how medicalization will affect their bodies for the rest of their lives. The “trans kid” phenomenon is not healthcare and stories like this are just the tip of the iceberg. It stems from a dangerous, sadistic, and abusive belief system that is fueling a health crisis, prioritizing profit and indoctrination over the physical and psychosocial well-being of boys and girls. We are going to keep exposing the truth until this issue is properly dealt with and everybody is held accountable.

Brianna Titone is the first openly transgender state legislator in Colorado and the 4th elected in the United States. Titone joins the Gays Against Groomers RADAR due to the countless groomer legislation that Titone has sponsored – all of which are aimed at brainwashing and castrating children. For someone who regularly makes narcissistic claims such as “I don’t want to be polarizing or a one-trick pony [1],” Titone has done quite the opposite. Before the election was even certified, Titone was seen speaking at a "Youth-led Trans March," sending the message that "We [gender ideologues who are poisoning children] need to continue marching, so we are not erased." What Titone is really saying to young impressionable children is "We are going to continue to jam our agenda down everyone’s throats and take control of the government so we can continue to push a radical agenda that results in the butchering of children." Titone seems to think that the war is won…for now. Titone has endorsed countless bills, which critics have deemed as polarizing. We deem them to be a nightmare. In 2019, Titone opened the door for children to begin their gender conversion therapy by passing Jude’s Law. This bill allows children to change the sex on their birth certificate. It also made Colorado the 3rd state to provide a "non-binary" option on Driver’s Licenses and Birth Certificates. Anybody who thinks that children have a civil right to legally switch their "gender identity" needs their head checked. In 2020, HB20-1114 died in the house as a result of Titone’s radical agenda. This bill would have protected minors from sexual reassignment surgery, and allowed any health care responsible for the unlawful sterilization of minors to be charged with a Class 3 Felony. A full copy of the law can be read [here]. On Nov. 1, 2022, Dragutante, a “non-profit organization” with the mission to create a so-called “safe-space” for children as young as 8-years old to practice drag publicly, acknowledged Titone’s long support for the program since its inception in 2017. In reality, there is nothing “safe” about what Dragutante does. They have created a treasure trove of thirst trap photos on their website and Instagram for creeps to get their jollies off with. This type of program is no better than children’s beauty pageants and should be universally outlawed. A very different path could have been taken to find a common ground amongst those who disagree, and with the rest of society. Instead, Titone manipulated lawmakers into blocking the "trans-sport ban" in February of 2023. We would also like to point out that nobody is being "banned" from any sports. It just makes it so players will have to compete on teams congruent with their sex. A law like this simply would have protected girls from having to compete in rough sports against biological boys, and even worse, share locker rooms with boys. Titone is literally erasing girl's rights with the blood of the LGBT community, who these traitors claim to advocate for. Most recently, Titone continued using the victim card by getting SB 23-188 passed. This law is controversial because its primary focus was to codify abortion rights in Colorado. Titone turned around and HIJACKED this bill, turning Colorado into a “safe haven” for people of ALL ages seeking gender-affirming care through an amendment in the 11th hour. To further clarify this bill was so poorly worded that it put no safe-guards of how old someone can be to begin “gender-affirming care,” meaning a 1 year old could begin the process. Reproductive healthcare has NOTHING to do with "gender-affirming care." All physical methods of sexual reassignment surgery effectively sterilize an individual. During the Legislative session, Titone had flippantly defended the bill, arguing that gender-affirming care saves lives. That is a lie. This flat-out false claim has been refuted countless times. The suicide rate in those that had completed Sexual Reassignment Surgery (SRS) increased 20 times over their peers who did not [2]. Additionally, as part of this dystopian law, it protects health care providers from litigation. In other words, after an innocent child who cannot consent to permanent life-altering surgery has had their developing body mutilated…they would have no possible recourse. It would prevent them from seeking justice for the criminal surgeries that were inflicted upon them. The full law can be read here: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb23-188 During our review of Titone, we stumbled across a tweet which was either a poorly conceived joke or an admission Titone had not completed Sexual Reassignment Surgery (SRS). Have you ever noticed that the people screaming at the top of their lungs in support of pediatric gender-denying care did not actually go through any of these processes as minors? Once you see it, you can't unsee it. This brings us to our biggest concern. If this tweet wasn’t a joke, then why would a fellow trans individual sponsor laws which permanently mutilate/sterilize children…and not carry out the procedure themselves? If these procedures are life-saving, as we are being told, then what is stopping someone from going through with it? We don’t blame Titone for the lack of follow-through. But believe us when we say that we have seen countless examples of these surgeries, which have a 32.5% complication rate in MtF surgeries [3] or worse a 76.5% complication rate in FtM surgeries [4]. Either way, we don’t care what you did with your body. We just want you to stop your radical agenda, stay away from the kids, and focus on the rest of your constituents for once. Maybe they should try considering the homelessness and teenage prostitution that is overrunning Colorado's city streets. But instead of discussing actual human rights atrocities, they would rather focus on "trans kids" and wonder why the pendulum is swinging so harshly and getting increasingly reactionary. Gays Against Groomers is about OFFENSE. We call out the corruption where we see it and clean up the mess that this agenda has allowed to fester in our name. Clutching your pearls and waiting for everything to fix itself will not work. That's now how you win. And we're here to win. References [1] : https://gazette.com/news/meet-brianna-titone-colorado-s-first-transgender-lawmaker/article_cd3a2a70-edc6-11e8-a0d5-1f3c610c8879.html [2] : https://www.heritage.org/gender/commentary/sex-reassignment-doesnt-work-here-the-evidence [3] : https://statsforgender.org/surgery/ [4] : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2050052122000129

Caitlin Spice is a transgender author of LGBTQ+ children's books. Caitlin Spice is a biological male who suffered from gender dysphoria growing up in the 80’s before the term was known and popularized. Caitlin’s parents were not sympathetic or understanding, an unsurprising sign of the times s/he grew up in. Spice began going by Caitlin online in the 90’s when the internet was in its infancy to cope and documented transitioning on a blog, which was heavily ridiculed and removed as a result. Through the years of being bullied online, Caitlin started writing short horror stories on Reddit, which were adapted by a podcast called NoSleep after gaining traction. Caitlin is now the co-author of a fantasy book geared towards children and young adults. Funded by a Kickstarter, Spice’s book titled ‘Raven Wild’ tells a story of a boy named Hawk who transitions into a woman called Raven in order to wield a gem that “controls all creatures in the realm.” It is part of a children's book series called Promised Land Tales, co-written with Adam Reynolds, Jaimee Poipoi and Chaz Harris, wherein the characters typically have a romantic interest that falls under the LGBTQ umbrella. Many readers are thankful for Raven Wild and even expressed that the book helped normalize sex transition and therefore encouraged youth to become trans or “non-binary.” Caitlin believes it is important to show children books containing trans characters so they feel “less alone,” and while we can understand the sentiment, these books can be confusing and too advanced for younger children. One parent described in a review on GoodReads having to “stop and explain each page” to their child. Introducing these concepts to young children can be overwhelming and introduce ideas and feelings they would not otherwise feel or consider without seeing them in a children’s book. In an interview with Proudly blog, Caitlin states that s/he would tell her younger self to “..run; to leave home as soon as I was able, to seek out trans-supportive communities...” [source] Caitlin advocates for children to keep secrets from their parents, as s/he was told to “stop [having gender dysphoria]” by family members and now believes “most parents don’t understand.” Caitlin has discussed this in tweets that have since been deleted but are still visible via search. Caitlin believes that transitioning sooner rather than later is ideal and lamented not having access to puberty blockers in the same interview with Proudly, but also claims s/he “never wanted to be transgender” and “it was not a choice.” But one must make the effort to either dress differently and medically transition or attend extensive therapy to understand the root of gender dysphoria and whether transitioning is truly appropriate, so it is in fact a choice, one that many young adults and minors are being pressured into making as soon as possible. With books like Raven Wild, Caitlin further pressures youth, although gently, and has become a source of mild propaganda for the gender confused. From the author’s perspective: In 2019, Caitlin did an interview with Stuff NZ about overcoming cyberbullies and rising above digital attacks unbothered. S/he has also tweeted in the past (March 23, 2022) to followers to “...stay as calm as possible, because the slightest uncomfortable interaction will be used to skewer trans people as a whole,” going on to say, “Unfortunately we end up representing our entire demographic when these incidents happen.” But s/he did not set Twitter followers up for success when posting my article which highlighted the pro-pedophilic beliefs of sexual revolutionaries who laid the groundwork for the trans movement, claiming “this will get people killed.” Spice subsequently posted my Twitter profile AFTER blocking me, and I received a high volume of violent and unhinged comments from followers of @catespice, one that lead to my account being locked for 12 hours just for responding to it. The article in question was heavily inspired by Reduxx and Women’s Voices, who also weren’t pleased by how I sourced the article. For that I do apologize, but I do not deserve harassment for spreading vital information exposing the pedophiles who have influenced the warped LGBTQ movement of today. But it is one thing to be hounded over sourcing, and another to receive violent remarks and death threats by @catespice followers for writing the article in the first place. Thanks to this activity, the article is now the most viewed on Gays Against Groomer’s website in the organization's history, so I suppose it’s not all bad. Thank you for the shoutout Caitlin, and I hope you enjoy being a hypocrite groomer on GAG’s Radar.

Hollywood actress, Megan Fox, has recently come under fire about her bizarre parenting choices. Her oldest son, who is now 10 years old, started wearing dresses around the age of 2. During pride month, Fox discussed how hard it is to protect him from “mean, awful” people online, according to Men’s Health Magazine. There is nothing wrong with kids wearing what makes them happy. Girls can like blue and boys can like pink. Liking blue does not make one a boy. Nor does liking pink make one a girl. According to a 2019 interview with People Magazine, Fox is supportive of her sons' gender nonconformity. "Sometimes, he'll dress himself and he likes to wear dresses, sometimes," Fox explained. "And I send him to a really liberal, hippy school, but even there — here in California — he still has little boys going, 'Boys don't wear dresses,' or 'Boys don't wear pink.’” Megan Fox has also revealed to Glamour Magazine that she bought books written by "transgender children" for her son Noah after he developed a desire to wear dresses. Confusion begins to arise when such gender stereotypes are forced upon children. Grown adults cannot even decide on a solid definition of "gender." How do we expect little kids to understand a concept that has no boundaries? Children are very impressionable. They should never be led to believe that they are something which they are not. Gays Against Groomers has been actively passing legislation and fighting against "gender identity" indoctrination being forced upon children in the classroom. From our experience, such California "liberal, hippy school schools" have become dysphoria factories, churning out lifelong pharmaceutical customers for the gender cult. They teach children that gender is on a spectrum, based on clothing. They are put under the impression that if you're a boy who likes to wear dresses, then you might not actually be a boy. Dangerous "gender identity" programs equate dresses with being female. And they are implemented via programs like Social-Emotional Learning, Mermaids (Kearns, 2018), and GLSEN. Megan Fox has constantly fought back against the allegations that she forces her eldest son to wear dresses and other female-exclusive clothing. This young boy's father, Brian Austin Green, has even been quoted saying ‘[whether] it’s dresses or goggles or slippers or whatever. It’s his life, they’re not my clothes.' Fox believes that we should “never use children for leverage or social currency, especially under malevolent and erroneous pretense.” This was in response to U.S. Congress candidate Robby Starbuck, who lived in the same gated community as Fox. Starbuck posted on Twitter that his kids and her kids used to play in the park together. And one day, two of Fox’s boys were having a meltdown, saying their mom was forcing them to wear girl clothes. If the allegation against her is forcing her young sons to wear clothes from the girls' section, then why did she bring up her child's "gender identity" in the post? Nobody accused her of having a transgender child. But in the state of California, your child can pick a "gender identity" behind your back and socially transition at school without parental consent. And if parents disagree with their imaginary "gender identity," then their child can be taken away from them, as per Senate Bill SB107 (Weiner, 2023). Is Megan Fox forcing her sons to wear dresses in order to garner woke points, like Starbuck accused her of? Or is she being held hostage by hippy dippy classroom nonsense? Both are currently possible in the state of California. It is a system which is completely devoid of common sense and rationality. Regardless, transgender kids are like vegan cats. We all know who's making the decisions. Megan Fox has officially been added to our RADAR. Gays Against Groomers will continue to send necessary updates about the war on children and what could be happening in your state. References Megan Fox Is Trying to Protect Her Kid From 'Mean, Awful People' Online (Sanchez, 2023) https://www.menshealth.com/entertainment/a43808072/megan-fox-interview-child-noah-son-dresses/ GLSEN https://www.glsen.org/activity/gender-terminology Don't Tell The Parents (Kearns, 2018) https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/don-t-tell-the-parents/ Courage Is A Habit (2023) https://twitter.com/CourageHabit/status/1678156014216986625?t=aOW-we_ZWuBZf0z_KNGtbA&s=19 Mermaids https://mermaidsuk.org.uk/ People Magazine (2023) https://people.com/parents/megan-fox-protecting-eldest-noah-from-school-bullies-wearing-dresses/ Glamour Magazine (2022) https://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/article/megan-fox-digital-cover-interview-april-2022 SENATOR WIENER’S HISTORIC BILL TO PROVIDE REFUGE FOR TRANS KIDS AND THEIR FAMILIES SIGNED INTO LAW (2023) https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/20220930-senator-wiener%E2%80%99s-historic-bill-provide-refuge-trans-kids-and-their-families-signed-law Brian Austin Green Slams Claim Ex Megan Fox Forces Sons to Wear "Girls Clothes" (Blynn, 2023) https://www.eonline.com/news/1376860/brian-austin-green-slams-claim-ex-megan-fox-forces-sons-to-wear-girls-clothe

Lindsay "Lindz" Amer is the host of the YouTube channel, Queer Kid Stuff. According to her official website, Lindsay Amer is an author, performer, and creator who “makes queer stuff for kids, families, educators, their loved ones, and allies”. You might be wondering, “What could queer stuff for kids possibly be?” And you’d be less-than-delighted to discover – as we were – that Lindsay specializes in creating content for VERY young children, even two-year-olds. She aims to teach them about queer topics such as transgenderism and drag queens, with a sprinkle of other age-inappropriate topics such as trans activism, abortion, and the 2016 election. Lindsay’s fascination with indoctrinating toddlers has earned her a spot on the Gays Against Groomers Radar. Queer Kid Stuff Anyone who was chronically online around 2016 will vividly remember a web-series called Queer Kid Stuff. Its existence seemed to elicit mostly ridicule at the time, rightfully so. Apparently, Lindsay Amer couldn't take a hint. Who in their right mind would create something like this? Armed with a decent singing voice, a ukelele, and a talking teddy bear, Lindsay Amer creates short episodes that are nauseatingly appealing to children. They are crafted in such a way that radical concepts come off as playful, wholesome, and capture children's attention. Each episode starts with a pleasant tune specifically addressing boys, girls, and nonbinary toddlers. "Gay means happy…you are enough here at Queer Kid Stuff." In the rainbow-filled studio, Lindsay cheerfully banters with Teddy, her talking teddy bear, about how cool and amazing it is to be whatever identity or sexuality she happens to be discussing in that particular episode. Just one example of the so-called "education" that Lindsay has to offer is in the twelfth episode, which is titled “T is for Trans!” “Oooh, that’s a cool new word!” quips Teddy, after Lindsay introduces her young audience to the word, ‘transgender’. Lindsay then continues to explain to Teddy that the first thing a doctor will tell parents when a baby is born is whether the baby is a boy or a girl. “That’s called a gender assignment," she asserts. If your eyeballs have started rolling back into the depths of your skull, further than you thought to be anatomically possible, you are certainly not alone. Teddy, quite reasonably, displays confusion because in an earlier episode, kids were taught that "There aren't just boys and girls." Lindsay Amer explains to her genderqueer teddy bear that “There’s something a bit weird about how doctors assign gender to babies … That’s because there aren’t only boys and girls." “Oh, so the doctors are wrong sometimes?” asks Teddy (they/them). “Yes, Teddy!” Lindsay answers, gleefully. Soon after, Lindsay ends the lesson by asking the young children watching to let her know in the comments how they identify, making it clear that she is very much interested in having conversations with small children about their sexual identity. There are many examples of outrageous things that Lindsay has felt compelled to show young children, including a drag makeup tutorial, an interview with the obviously confused “drag kid," Desmond is Amazing, and a lesson on how cool it is to be nonbinary. Confusing kids about their identity is not cool. It's weird. Unfortunately, this creepy children's show was only the beginning. Her projects became more and more ridiculous over time. Lindsay Amer: Child-Development Expert It is worth pointing out that while Lindsay makes impeccable use of her college education in theater and gender studies (shocker), she lacks any formal education in teaching or child-development. But she still takes it upon herself to lecture parents about how to raise their children. For her groundbreaking work on Queer Kid Stuff, Lindsay was given the opportunity, clearly only afforded to society’s most esteemed academics, to have her own illustrious TED Talk. She gives a talk titled “Why Kids Need To Learn About Gender and Sexuality." She begins by telling the audience about Queer Kid Stuff, emphasizing that the content is for all-ages, meaning people ranging from “literal babies to your great-great grandma." In a fleeting moment of self-awareness, she recognizes that people may be wary of “talking about gay stuff with kids.” But she reassures the audience that “talking to kids about gay stuff is actually crucial." The reasoning she cites for this is that “The American Academy of Pediatrics has found that children have a solid understanding of their gender identity by the age of four.” "Gender Identity" is the idea that there exists an internal gender inside all of us, which is separate from our sexed body (Goldie, 2014). It is essentially a religious belief, similar to the concept of a spirit. Your "gender identity" lives within you and transcends the boundaries of one's physical body. It may be a different sex/gender than your body. This backwards concept was invented in the mid-1900s and set the groundwork for the eventual sterilization of children. (Smith, 2023). This internal feeling can also be a different age than the physical body, according to the pedophile advocate who came up with it (Money, 1981). “Chronophilia” (Money, 1986), a palatable rebranding of his ideas about “age-discrepancy paraphilias” (Money, 1981) can be seen in modern-day concepts like “trans-age.” Queer kid activists claim that people have an inner-child whose age does not match up with one’s “biological age" (Money, 1981). Her assertion that children have a "gender identity" at the age of four was invented by a child predator who was infamous for violating children. No such entity exists, and queer ideologues like Lindsay Amer are pushing these abstract beliefs onto young kids (GAG, 2023). At this point, it is made abundantly clear that Lindsay creates content for children of such young ages to beat them to the punch. Her lectures about transgenderism seek to give toddlers fancy new ways to identify before they can build a solid understanding for themselves. No speech on the topic would be complete, however, without instilling fear into the listener. She goes on to solemnly list some statistics regarding suicide in LGBT youth. This tactic is common in the modern discourse of kids who are supposedly transgender – warning parents that if they don’t affirm whatever the child says they are by giving them puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries, that their children will become a statistic – the parents will be culpable for the death of their child. It is a demented form of gaslighting and manipulation. Lindsay has also published a book titled “Rainbow Parenting: A Guide to Raising Queer Kids and their Allies” (Amer, 2023). We aren’t quite charitable enough to pay to buy the book (and help line Lindsay’s pockets), but she has posted a video explaining some things that are in the book. As expected, she mentions that the early parts of the book contain warnings for parents as to why they need to raise their children the way she says to (presumably so they don’t kill themselves, of course). She says the book is organized by age group with age-appropriate lessons for each. Most notably, she mentions a few topics contained in the toddler section of the book such as “queerness” and “age-relevant sex-ed” like “where do babies come from," but in a “gender-inclusive way” (Amer, 2023). The next section, for pre-kindergarten children, includes topics such as drag, gender euphoria, gender assignment, as well as teaching them that “gender plus love equals sexuality." It is one of the books featured in her queer book club, where she reads stories about drag queens, pronouns, and abortion. The fact that Lindsay writes books about sex for four-year-olds in order to help them understand their "gender identity" should tell you everything you need to know about this boundary-violating ideology. She is currently writing another children's book – the highly anticipated sequel, “Hooray for She, He, Ze, and They!: What Are Your Pronouns Today?” It is set for release in February 2024. It already sounds like a train wreck in the making. We're so excited. Kids and Kink While Lindsay doesn’t seem to be making new episodes of Queer Kids stuff, she is certainly still active online. Her Youtube channel is now mostly dedicated to “Rainbow Storytime," which is exactly what you assume it would be – reading books about sex and gender to kids. She also posts videos to TikTok which, to our pleasant surprise, are actually not targeted to children. However, Lindsay has recently garnered some controversy from statements she made on the platform. It starts with a video where she explains her take (which she describes in the caption as being “unpopular”) on making pride kid-friendly. It’s a vague message about how making pride events kid-friendly “isn’t about sanitizing them. It’s about including kids’ voices in our justice movements.” Contrary to what intuition may tell you, Lindsay seems to be suggesting that this take is unpopular because it’s less radical, and not more. It seems that Lindsay was expecting pushback from her own side by suggesting that pride might need to be made kid-friendly, as opposed to all the depraved things we’ve seen at pride events that are considered okie-dokie for kids to be present for. She was right about backlash from her own, because someone (who we can only hope is just a clever troll) commented on the video saying “I’ve never seen kink at pride that felt inappropriate for kids." The meat of the controversy comes from a video response that Lindsay made to this comment. “I wanna clarify this for a second here” she starts. “I’m not saying kink isn’t kid friendly. I’m saying that kids and kink can coexist at pride in a totally fine way." Yikes. She digs the hole ever-deeper by trying to explain that “making an event kid-friendly doesn’t mean sanitizing it, AKA taking something like kink out of pride." She finishes the video with “So I’m not saying that kink is inappropriate for kids. I’m saying they can and should coexist with each other." She has disabled the comments on the video, as you can imagine. She addresses the controversy one more time in an additional video where she says her previous video actually isn’t about kids and kink coexisting at pride. It’s about including kids’ voices in social justice movements (and similar woke gobbledygook). She then goes on to read a lengthy section of her book which she says is about the “kids and kink discourse” where she ultimately justifies kink at pride because “kids simply don’t associate leather with kink or sex or kinky sex, for that matter. They see leather as leather, a clothing material, and just that…The sex connotations of leather almost surely won’t occur to kids cause it’s very unlikely that they’re actually watching someone have kinky leather sex at a pride parade." Sure, kids won’t automatically understand that the leather has anything to do with sex. Not until you inevitably tell them, that is. Lindsay already advocates for teaching topics to children that are simply not age-appropriate. Why would she stop at teaching them about kinky sex? Secondly, the chance of witnessing someone having kinky leather sex at pride is starkly more common than Lindsay seems to think. Anyone who has been to a pride parade in a big city has likely witnessed it firsthand, and the internet is flooded every year around pride month with videos of lewd acts occurring openly in front of children. Final Thoughts To her credit, Lindsay Amer often says that the parents should be present while their child watches her content – in stark contrast to other activists who strategically isolate children from their parents. However, even though Lindsay seems to genuinely care about the children she is attempting to educate, she is still actively desensitizing them to sexual content and imagery. Lindsay has earned her spot on the Gays Against Groomers Radar because of her repeated and shameless attempts to indoctrinate toddlers, fixation on encouraging children to identify as transgender or nonbinary, and belief that kids and kink should coexist. We denounce this filth in its entirety. REFERENCES Lindz Amer Queer Kid Stuff - YouTube Why kids need to learn about gender and sexuality | Lindsay Amer - YouTube John Money (1981) Paraphilias: Phyletic Origins of Erotosexual Dysfunction, International Journal of Mental Health, 10:2-3, 75-109, DOI: 10.1080/00207411.1981.11448888 Dr John Money and the sinister origins of gender ideology How a cruel, amoral experiment helped birth today's trans movement. LAUREN SMITH February 2023 https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/02/05/dr-john-money-and-the-sinister-origins-of-gender-ideology/ John Money: The Godfather of Gender Identity and Pedophile Apologist (Gays Against Groomers, 2023) https://www.gaysagainstgroomers.com/post/john-money-the-godfather-of-gender-identity-and-pedophile-apologist The Man Who Invented Gender: Engaging the Ideas of John Money, University of British Columbia Press, 2014. Goldie, Terry. https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774827942 https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8YUSVfo/ https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8YUY4cN/ Rainbow Parenting: Your Guide to Raising Queer Kids and Their Allies (Lindsay Amer, 2023)

The billionaire family funding childhood sex changes. The Pritzker family has long since been known as not only an Illinois dynasty, but also as a thorn in the side of progress for LGB&T Illinoisans. They have long since been identified as one of the wealthiest families in the United States and are recognized by their business holdings in various corporations. In addition, one of the most recognizable members of the family is currently the governor of Illinois. However, the Pritzker family has also been recognized for their views on the transgender indoctrination of children. One of the most well-known family members goes by the name of Jennifer Pritzker. Jennifer was born as a biological male and later in life, transitioned to being a woman. According to the Family Research Council, “Pritzker donated $1 million to the Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago for a Gender and Sex Development Program." Jennifer Pritzker also founded (and continues to run) the TAWANI foundation. The TAWANI foundation provides grants to what they describe as ‘health and human rights.' In addition, The Pritzker family fortune has been tied directly toward LGBT organizations that teach their opinions and views to a very young and at-risk audience. One particular example was reported by The Hill, a Washington D.C. based new organization. “It began with requiring schools to teach the role and contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people in history textbooks. One of the first states to adopt this was Illinois, where James Pritzker’s cousin J.B. Pritzker, signed it into law." Since 2019, The Pritzker family has been providing ‘charitable donations’ and other financial assistance toward gender affirming care for minor aged children. One of the most noticeable examples is with the Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago. There exists a department referred to as the ‘Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health’ and was started with a ‘$15 million gift from the Pritzker Foundation in 2019.' During 2019, Governor Pritzker also issued Executive Order 19-11. As reported by TabletMag, the Executive Order was titled as “Strengthening Our Commitment to Affirming and Inclusive Schools, to welcome and support children with manufactured sex identities." In 2021, a new sexual education bill was signed into law (Bill SB0 818). The bill would instill gender ideology as well as gender role stereotypes and sexual reproduction for Kindergarten through 2nd grade children. “By Grades 3-5, children should be able to describe the potential role of hormone blockers on young people who identify as transgender." Is the Pritzker family directly indoctrinating children in order to get the support of a broader group? Perhaps it’s to gain support for JB’s potential future presidential run. It’s certainly possible in a state like Illinois. Children’s minds are still developing and will continue to do so until about age 25. References: The Staggering Reach of Billionaire Transgender Activists (frc.org) Illinois House votes to require LGBT history curriculum be taught in schools | The Hill Our Focus - Tawani Foundation JB Pritzker, Jennifer Pritzker, & Synthetic Sex Identities - Tablet Magazine

You may have seen Jeffrey Marsh around various corners of the internet from different angles that depend on which side of the woke culture spectrum you fall on. If you ask the neo-LGBTQ+ crowd that believes you can use different pronouns every single day and demand strangers be arrested for not following along, Marsh is a “non-binary transgender inspirational life coach, writer and LGBTQ activist,” who offers tidbits of advice (typically addressed to “kids”) primarily through TikTok and Patreon. If you don’t believe in a recently invented set of pseudo-nonsensical psychologically manipulative ideals about gender, Marsh is a man who seems to believe he’s invented cross-dressing and enjoys telling young people to cut off their parents and talk to him instead, sometimes for a fee. Fans and supporters are asked to refer to Marsh using “they/them” pronouns, which will not be done in this article. To claim to be both non-binary and transgender is contradictory. One is either an androgynous man or woman who enjoys cross-dressing or a transsexual, one who has medically and physically transitioned to present as the opposite sex. Instead of this reality that was once widely accepted, Marsh pushes the ideas that the gender binary is wrong. According to Jeffrey, gender is a construct, gender is not the same and sex, and you can in fact reject this reality in favor of your own. And if your family and friends can’t accept that, Jeffrey Marsh is here to emotionally coach you through it. In fact, if you pay extra, he’ll be your personal life coach. Marsh’s qualifications for giving life advice include living as a monk for years in California to learn the art of Soto Zen and becoming a licensed life coach, though there is no accessible evidence of the license itself. There are several disclaimers on his site and Patreon that imply he doesn’t speak directly to supporters, cannot diagnose mental illnesses and does not offer services to minors. He is known for occasionally making one of his supporters chase him down after paying a whopping $1k for his “Premium Package” of Zoom meetings. Marsh built his fan base by writing a self-help book and spouting cliches in videos, which has lead him to an endorsement on Oprah’s website. All in all, one can see Marsh has tried to cover his bases and avoid controversy, but that hasn’t stopped people from pointing out the obvious: Jeffrey Marsh wants to talk to your kids. Jeffrey doesn’t have any kids, alludes to having a strained relationship with his own parents, and opens many videos with “I wanna talk to the kids,” or “Hi, kids!” He has also described himself as “Christlike,” despite practicing Buddhism. Grooming 101 involves establishing a relationship with the intended target and either separating the target from their families or establishing a relationship with their families as well. Marsh is big on what is referred to as “going no contact,” or cutting off family members if they “don’t understand you.” His use of language and speech pattern often resembles cult leaders who lure members in with wide eyes and a soft voice to demand control. It’s important to know the signs of grooming with the intent of sexual abuse. Those who do may recognize several of the signs in Jeffrey’s content. But the average person who has never seen one of his videos, upon watching just a handful, would more than likely ask themselves “who is this creep and why does he want to talk to kids so much?” But Jeffrey has deflected these accusations more than once, often turning on the commenter and accusing them of the same behavior, which is a classic narcissistic tactic of someone who does not want to acknowledge what they themselves are doing. Marsh’s fan base can be vicious, and a few of them even managed to track down one of his accusers, posting photos of her without her hijab and threatening her entire family. [source] Marsh seems to project a lot of his own issues for someone who claims to coach others through life, but since he’s not actually a licensed therapist, it seems he can get away with toeing a very careful line while encouraging young people to sign up for a more private line of communicating with him. We cannot yet prove that Jeffrey Marsh is actively abusing minors, but we sure do recommend knowing who he is and making sure he isn’t influencing your children. Until then, we’re keeping a vigilant eye out for Mr. Marsh in the headlines. And for good measure, here’s a creepy compilation of videos of himself deleted, but the internet never forgets. Sources: Daily Citizen: Yes, Trans Activists Admit They Are Grooming Your Kids - Daily Citizen (focusonthefamily.com) The American Conservative Jeffrey Marsh Groomer 101 TikTok Tutorial - The American Conservative BySurf Jeffrey Marsh: The CHILD GROOMER of LGBTQ

Lawsuits are being filed against public schools all over the country as the rights of parents are being pushed to the side in order to conceal the preferred pronouns and new transgender identities of children all across America. According to Education Week, “Over the last three years, parents in at least six states have sued school districts over policies the districts say support transgender, gender nonconforming, and nonbinary students (Pendharkar, 2023)." The efforts made to sue public schools for such things usually don’t make it very far due to state policy and legislature. If you live in Washington State, you probably wouldn’t be surprised to find that informing parents of their child’s gender transition or new preferred pronouns is simply against school policy. Any teacher that breaks this policy in Washington State will likely lose their job. According to research done by the Williams Institute, 1.09% of Washington children between ages 13-17 identified as transgender in 2022 (Herman et al., 2022). That’s over twice as many as the 0.7% of trans-identifying Washington children they found in their 2017 study (Herman et al., 2017). In order to understand why so many Washington children are falling prey to gender ideology, it’s important to understand that it is being presented to them at school on a regular basis from a very young age. For example, the Seattle Public School website expresses that they are in full support of teaching children about transgender identity and expression to the extent that they even share samples of videos and lessons intended to teach gender ideology to children from kindergarten to 5th grade (Seattle Public Schools, 2022). There are literally hundreds of books relating to gender ideology spread all throughout the Seattle Public School libraries (Seattle Public School, 2022) and that doesn’t include books brought directly into classrooms by teachers and other LGBTQ+ organizations. What used to be the Gay Straight Alliance is now called the "Gender and Sexuality Alliance" and they are no longer only in high schools. Some Washington middle schools also have the GSA available as a resource for confused children as well. Gender ideology is written into the school curriculum and ingrained into everyday life at school to the point that every child will be encouraged to question their sex before they hit puberty. According to the Washington State School Directors Association, the school employees are to set up a meeting with any transgender-identifying child as soon as they are made aware of the child’s decision to go by a different name or change of pronouns. The purpose of the meeting is to ask the child if they need accommodation for their transition and to ask the child if they want their new identity kept from the parents. Policy 3211 states “Before communicating with parents of transgender or gender expansive students, it’s important to ask the student how school employees should refer to the student when talking with their parents and guardians. For families who are supportive, using the student’s name and pronoun could be affirming for the student. For parents who are not supportive, or who are not aware of the student’s transition at school, referring to their name and pronoun could be very dangerous. The district will not condone the intentional or persistent refusal to respect a student’s gender identity or gender expression, or inappropriate release of information regarding a student’s transgender or gender-expansive status” (Gender-Inclusive Schools, 2019). We encourage all Washington parents to pay close attention to what is happening at their child’s school. Children in the Washington public school system will be introduced to gender ideology at school, regardless of whether or not parental authorities are informed. Even if your child’s teacher wants to keep you informed, they are not allowed to release any information about your child’s gender identity or expression without the child’s permission. Every school employee must affirm your child’s new transgender identity according to policy 3211 which states “The school must use the name and gender by which the student identifies on all other records, including but not limited to school identification cards, classroom seating charts, athletic rosters, yearbook entries, diplomas, directory information” (Gender-Inclusive Schools [procedure], 2019). You can look through your child’s backpack, social media and make an appearance on campus, but you cannot depend on their school to let you know if your child is heading down the path of gender transition. True inclusiveness does not exclude parents or disregard parental consent. Nobody should ever feel excluded from their children's education. Teachers being instructed to keep secrets from parents is wrong, especially when it involves medical interventions that come with severe ramifications. Allowing a child to adopt a secret identity at school is not the way to teach acceptance. All this does is instill distrust in parents that their son or daughter may be living a secret day-to-day life. And in turn, it teaches children that they cannot trust the adults in their lives. Gays Against Groomers promotes the idea that in order to foster an education system that benefits everyone, it is going to take unity amongst people who wish to lead by example in their communities. It is necessary to optimize communication between students, parents, teachers, school boards, those who make the decisions, and their respective communities. As standardized test scores keep plummeting lower and lower, an entire generation of boys and girls may depend on it. REFERENCES Pendharkar, Eesha. “Parents Are Suing Schools over Pronoun Policies. Here’s What You Need to Know.” Education Week, Education Week, 15 May 2023, www.edweek.org/leadership/parents-are-suing-schools-over-pronoun-policies-heres-what-you-need-to-know/2023/05. Herman, Jody L, et al. “How Many Adults and Youth Identify as Transgender in the United States?” Williams Institute, June 2022, williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Trans-Pop-Update-Jun-2022.pdf. Herman, Jody L, Andrew Flores, and Taylor Brown. “Age of Individuals Who Identify as Transgender in the United States.” AGE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO IDENTIFY AS TRANSGENDER IN THE UNITED STATES, Jan. 2017, williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Age-Trans-Individuals-Jan-2017.pdf. Seattle Public Schools. “K-5 Gender Books, Lessons, and Videos.” Seattle Public Schools, 25 Mar. 2022, www.seattleschools.org/departments/health-education/lgbtq-programs-curriculum-and-support/list-of-books-by-grade/. Seattle Public Schools. “Library Services.” Seattle Public Schools, 3 Mar. 2023, spscatalog.seattleschools.org/cataloging/servlet/handlebasicsearchform.do. “Gender-Inclusive Schools (Procedure).” Washington State School Directors Association, 1 July 2019, wssda.app.box.com/s/1c2bjp451nezhbdjvyxl2fqcwvuwdxaa.

The war on children is more noticeable than ever. They are being injected with synthetic hormones before they can properly consent. They are receiving surgeries that irreversibly damage their bodies. They are told that this is necessary and they cannot live a happy life without receiving off-label interventions to satisfy an urge that was put in their heads by the adults in their lives who they are supposed to trust the most. "Gender-affirming care" has been declared as experimental – rightfully so. Boys and girls are being used as lab rats. They are being experimented on. And it doesn't just stop there. Just when you thought the war on children could not get any worse, a new experiment is gaining popularity and endangering our most vulnerable: newborn babies. Men who identify as women are now seeking resources to breastfeed babies. This sacred act that has always been between a mother and her newborn baby is now being colonized by adult men pumping themselves with dangerous drugs to “affirm" their "gender identity” via having a newborn suck on their male nipples. In order to truly understand how outrageous this is, one must first understand how important breastfeeding is. Breastfeeding is one of the most natural processes a woman can carry out, on the basis of health, maternity, and biological functioning. It is an aspect of motherhood that must be protected at all costs. Breastfeeding provides critical unmatched protection for newborn babies in the first few months of life, as well as creating a unique bond between a mother and her child that is not like any other. Breast milk is referred to as liquid gold, as it contains more than 200 ingredients including water, proteins, good fats, carbohydrates, antibodies, lactoferrin, vitamins A, D, E and K, minerals, necessary hormones, growth factor and good bacteria. The CDC states that breastfeeding helps protect babies from asthma, obesity, type 1 diabetes, severe lower respiratory diseases, acute otitis media, gastrointestinal infections, necrotizing enterocolitis, creates constant and routine mother/baby interaction, helps increase skin to skin duration, and even helps prevent SIDS. Breastfeeding provides ALL of the nutrients a baby needs, and your breast milk changes daily to adjust to your baby's individual needs. During a growth spurt, your baby will signal to their mothers body to produce more high fat milk by cluster feeding. When a baby is sick, their saliva will trigger a biological response when in contact with their mother's nipples, triggering her body to produce more milk with illness-specific antibodies. Women are the ONLY mammals in the animal kingdom whose milk fluctuates antibodies depending on the health of mother and her baby. Holistic doctors often suggest putting drops of breast milk (from a EBF mom) into babies' ears or eyes to help clear up irritation or infection. Breast milk can be used for diaper rashes, a natural eczema treatment, and to cure cradle cap. Breastfeeding doesn't only provide benefits for babies, it also has many benefits for the mother, such as reduced risk of postpartum depression, helps engage and facilitate maternal bonding, lowers the risk for type 2 diabetes, and even lowers the risk of cancer. According to Dr. Ruth Petersen, director of CDC’s Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity,“Breastfeeding provides unmatched health benefits for babies and mothers. It is the clinical gold standard for infant feeding and nutrition, with breast milk uniquely tailored to meet the health needs of a growing baby. We must do more to create supportive and safe environments for mothers who choose to breastfeed.” All of these benefits do not come easily. It is extremely difficult for most mothers to exclusively breastfeed their babies. According to the CDC, only 24% of babies are exclusively breastfed through 6 months and only 17% percent are still breastfed at 18 months - despite the World Health Organization recommending breastfeeding until at least the age of two. The early days of breastfeeding a newborn is filled with pure exhaustion. It's a commitment to give your entire self, physically and mentally, to this new little human. Unlike formula-fed babies, exclusively breastfed babies need to feed every two hours, around the clock, 24/7 with no breaks. This means the mother will be attached to her baby at all times with the exception of the 60 minute intervals she has for sleep. A new mother's breasts will fill and become engorged as her body regulates to the rhythm of her new baby's needs. Despite the early challenges, babies are born with the instinct to be breastfed. Once they are born and placed onto the mother's chest for “skin to skin," they will root as they are cued simply by SMELLING their mother. Newborns are tuned into mothers smell, sound of her heartbeat, and voice. The first few weeks of life, a baby has to work overtime to breastfeed. Latching correctly is difficult for both mom and baby, and the baby has to really work to stimulate the breast into let down. In fact, breastfeeding is so tiring for a newborn that they usually need to sleep immediately after feeding. Sometimes they are too tired to stimulate let down and have to be roused to ensure proper nutrition. Women’s breasts are designed for let down, males' nipples are not. A baby latching onto a male nipple to suckle for milk will have to suckle past the point of exhaustion just to get a drop. Studies have shown that even with medication to help produce “milk” production, it is not enough for it to be nutritionally beneficial for the baby. Men who call themselves "mothers" are using The Newman-gold garb protocol, a protocol which was originally developed for mothers of adopted babies or for mothers whose baby was born via surrogate. The protocol involves taking exogenous hormones to induce lactating and breast pumping every 2-3 hours. This method was NOT intended for males to use. The chemicals that these men are using in an attempt to lactate are Domperidone and Motilium, which increase levels of prolactin, thus tricking their male bodies into producing milk. This drug is incredibly dangerous and is banned in the United States. The U.S pulled Domperidone from the market after it was found to be causing fatal cardiac arrhythmias. Its intended use is to help treat nausea and vomiting. Using it as an attempt to induce lactation is off label. There have been studies on this drug and it has been found to pass through breast milk and enter babies' bodies. Yes, you read the right. These off-label drugs, some of which are dangerous and illegal, are entering the newborn's bodies. This sounds very unsafe. And infants cannot communicate if they are having any negative side effects from this poison. It has been widely shared that the potential effects of this medication could cause potentially FATAL outcomes for the newborn. This is not breast milk. It may look or taste like breast milk, but it is poison, plain and simple. Not to mention there has been no significant evidence to suggest this toxic fluid is equivalent to female breast milk. There has been one study showing male breast milk does contain "...Values of protein, fat, lactose and calorie content at or above those of standard-term milk," but as stated above, those are not the only ingredients in natural womens breast milk – nor does it account for the importance of changing antibodies to protect and heal. There is much risk with no reward for the baby. Why would anyone do such a thing to a newborn baby, when it can potentially harm them…or worse. The attempt to normalize male breastfeeding does not only create space for potential physical and emotional harm, but there is also an erotic component to it. It is a paraphilic disorder which primarily occurs in heterosexual men. These men are often married to/partner with women. And it has been noted that they become jealous of their wives while she is pregnant. This paraphilia is called "Autogynephilia," which simply means "love for oneself as a woman." Autogynephilia has been sweeping the nation and bleeding heavily into transgender spaces. It is defined as a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as female. These men go through Hormone Replacement Therapy and get surgery in order to obtain female-looking body parts in order to satisfy their fetishistic desire for womanhood. While trans activists claim that this phenomenon is not real, it is still diagnosed as a sub-category of Transvestic Disorder. Research on the topic is still carried out. So far, there are four different types of autogynephilia that have been documented in men who identify as women (Lawrence, 2012). The four types are Transvestic Autogynephilia (erotic arousal associated with the act or fantasy of wearing women’s clothing), Anatomic Autogynephilia (arousal associated with the fantasy or reality of having female anatomic features), Behavioral Autogynephilia (arousal associated with the act or fantasy of engaging in female-typical behavior), and Physiologic Autogynephilia (arousal associated with the fantasy or simulation of being pregnant, menstruating, or lactating). Although physiologic autogynephilia is probably the least common type, several informants and case studies have noted its presence in these men. Fantasies involving pregnancy were especially frequent in this group (2012). It's a fetish. It is a fetish which manifests into a paraphilic disorder where they experience distress from not having female bodies. The most disturbing part is that men who have this erotic dysfunction are trying to obtain "civil rights" on the basis of their so-called "gender identity." What civil rights do they not have? The hard truth is that they are campaigning for the "civil right" to force others to participate in their fetish. They often experience sexual gratification from being referred to as women and obtaining female-typical anatomy. "Transgender rights" are currently a hot topic in the United States. They include easy access to hormones and surgery on demand. And they include "pronoun mandates," where it is required to refer to a man as she/her, or else one can get charged with "sex harassment" towards these men. It strips women of their free speech, forcing them to lie and unknowingly participate in somebody's autogynephilic sexual fantasy…or else. Everyone has different opinions on pronoun usage, have a right to free speech, and the ability to call others what they want. This takes away that free speech and people are not allowed to opt-out of partaking in somebody's fetish. It is a form of boundary violation to force a woman to participate in a man's sexual fetish without her knowledge or consent. Nobody has the "civil right" to coerce women into satisfying a man's sexual fetish. And this is being forced upon the public under the guise of "inclusion, tolerance, and acceptance." No, thank you. How many autogynephilic men are using the label of "transgender" to breastfeed their newborn babies while simultaneously receiving sexual pleasure from their paraphilia? The act of breastfeeding is natural for a mother and her baby. It is something that should be understood and protected in all circumstances. A mother sustains life, single handedly through a biological process only a woman possesses. A baby is fine tuned to instinctually cling to their biological mother for their protection and nutritional needs. Fathers do not and should not breastfeed - and a man can never be a mother. Sacrificing babies in the name of “gender affirming care” in order to indulge a sick delusion should never be normalized.

In 2007 the iPhone was officially released to the public, marking a significant turning point in technological development.Since then, users of iPhones and smartphones alike have been able to chat with distant relatives, bank online, and download a complete library of music. Apps like YouTube, Twitter, and Meta (formally known as Facebook and Instagram) became mainstream media sites. People used the iPhone in a way that increased productivity. With all the hype, parents felt obligated or pressured to give their teenagers phones and tablets. Eventually, smartphones and tablets were brought to classrooms to be used as learning tools. But as some of us understand, technology is both a blessing and a curse. The unintended consequences of giving young people access to powerful technology 24/7 has been a massive oversight. Sites like Pornhub.com are easily accessible to anyone with a smartphone. Anyone can lie about their age with a simple tap. YouTube videos shuffle through an automatic playlist based on an algorithm, which can quickly become twisted and perverse. By allowing children access to infinite content, we have endangered developing minds. Not only do young children have access to pornography, adults have access to this new genre of distracting “entertainment.” Young minds can be exposed to content depicting scenarios that reinforce a narrative that they too can engage in obscene acts with no consequences. It’s no secret that pornography has been around since the invention of video and print. One could make the argument that porn is a loosely used word. If we expanded this word to include drawings, we could safely say it has been around for ages. Even during the Roman era, they had images that were pornographic. Famous scenes of young male prostitutes engaging in sex acts with older men was not uncommon. History of humans tells us that porn is embedded in society, whether that be through videos, drawings, or pictures. With the invention of the internet, the possibilities of pornography became limitless. Sites like Pornhub host studios that cater to just about anyone all around the world. Thanks to this flexibility, people with dark desires can indulge, even if those desires include pedophelic fantasies. In a channel 4 documentary titled “Porn Actors Pretend To Be Underage During Sex,” the adult actor Austin depicts himself as an underage boy. This is unfortunately common in themes of pornography. The films are centered around "daddies" having sex with their sons. The genre is called Daddy/son porn, and similar incestual genres exist. Now people have access to fantasize about daddies having sex with their own sons. Not only is this incest, it is also pedophilic. One can fantasize about something to such a level that they may consciously or unconsciously seek it out in the real world. These videos are often allowed to exist, even if the actors are technically underage, largely due to laws in other countries where the age of consent is lower and the laws are looser. To say this content doesn’t have devastating effects on the human brain would be utter folly. Multiple scientific studies have proven that when grown men in particular regularly consume pornography, their motivation is whittled away while their prefrontal cortex becomes weaker. Anything one does frequently can alter the brain, but frequent pornography consumption quite literally cripples the part of the brain that makes decisions, plans, and regulates emotions. Additionally, pornography changes the way adults relate to one another as well as their sexual expectations, which are typically unrealistic as well as violent depending on the type of pornography a person is interested in. Therefore, trying to regulate and normalize pornography for young people who haven’t reached full cognitive development is extremely dangerous, and has the potential to create a generation of miswired hyper-sexualized adults who aren’t able to connect or empathize with one another. In fact, one could argue that that has already happened. This is the destructive side of limitless technology, and sites that host pornography are well aware. They simply do not care. The sites that cater to these individuals have a Machiavellian agenda. They are putting this content out to garner more dollars, and they argue that this content is to help pedophiles experience their fantasies without engaging in any illegal activities. But not only does pornography rewire the brain, it creates addictive behaviors and opens doors to ideas and concepts to both adults and children alike that could prove detrimental to their wellbeing. Porn sites have been paving a long immoral road to normalized pedophilia with no regard as to the long term impacts on society and future generations. We have to start acknowledging this and holding these sites accountable for enabling this darkness before it’s too late. REFERENCES “How Does Pornhub Make Money: Business Model Explained.” Adent Blog, 24 Mar. 2023, adent.io/blog/how-does-pornhub-make-money Porn Actor Pretends To Be Underage During Sex YouTube 1 December 2021 youtube.com/watch?v=ENbJem8VvRc Your Brain on Porn and Other Sexual Images - Scientific American scientificamerican.com/article/your-brain-on-porn-and-other-sexual-images/

“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” - Title IX, Women's Liberation Movement (1972) Title IX was a pivotal moment in the fight for equality for males and females, on the basis of sex. Title IX addresses sex-based discrimination in any educational program or activity that receives federal funding. It is designed to provide sex-based rights and protect individuals from discrimination based on their sex – male or female. Under Title IX, schools are required to provide equal opportunities and benefits to both male and female students in all areas, including admissions, athletics, academics, and extracurricular activities. It prohibits sex-based discrimination in any form, such as differential treatment, harassment, or exclusion. These rights are essential for promoting a safe and fair educational environment. The Biden Administration has interpreted Title IX to protect "transgender students" from sex-based discrimination. The U.S. Department of Education has issued guidance indicating that schools should treat students consistent with their "gender identity." This would dramatically broaden the scope of existing Title IX protections. By adding "gender identity" as a protected sex-based category, then "sex" no longer means what it was intended to. If sex and gender are different, then why is there a push to add gender as a subcategory of sex, therefore conflating the two? The Biden Administration's proposed updates mention that although "sex" was always interpreted to refer to male and female, sex is actually a complicated topic and cannot be properly defined. They also make note that when Title IX was first created, there was no solid specification for what "sex" refers to in the law. That is ridiculous. Sex-based rights always referred to maleness and femaleness, according to corresponding laws and the way they were implemented. The reason why they didn't bother to provide a definition of "sex" in 1972 probably has something to do with the fact that up until three years ago, everybody knew how babies were made. And it was not considered hateful to say that humans cannot change sex. Laws like these are completely dependent on the sex binary because they divide people into two sex classes to address the way that biological sex impacts how they are treated differently and the discrimination that arises from sex differences. Those who disagree with this new interpretation argue that allowing "transgender students" to access the rights and protections reserved for the opposite sex is unfair and may undermine opportunities and privacy rights. The Biden Administration's decision to add "gender identity" to Title IX led to an avalanche of bills being filed across the nation, many of which directly interfere with the proposed updates. Gays Against Groomers has loudly supported many of these bills and have worked with lawmakers to pass legislation. We primarily have focused on the public school curriculum, female-only sports and spaces in schools, sex harassment guidelines, and child transition. All of these issues are directly related to preserving Title IX in its original form. These bills have been misrepresented in the media and labeled as "anti-LGBTQ+" but all they do is restore common sense and reality. The state of North Carolina recently passed three laws that are consistent with the original interpretation of sex and gender in the law. They were originally vetoed by Governor Cooper, but the vetoes were overridden this week. Here's the breakdown from our point of view: Sports and Spaces "The North Carolina house and senate has now officially overridden the veto of Gov Cooper of HB 574, the Fairness in Women's Sports Act. The bill is now law in North Carolina! It passed with bipartisan support." The passage of Title IX in 1972 meant that by 1973 there were college scholarships at the larger schools, money for equipment and uniforms, and expanded travel schedules. In 1971, fewer than 295,000 girls participated in high school varsity athletics, accounting for just 7 percent of all varsity athletes; in 2001, that number leaped to 2.8 million, or 41.5 percent of all varsity athletes, according to the National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. In 1966, 16,000 females competed in intercollegiate athletics. By 2001, that number jumped to more than 150,000, accounting for 43 percent of all college athletes. In addition, a 2008 study of intercollegiate athletics showed that women’s collegiate sports had grown to 9,101 teams, or 8.65 per school. The five most frequently offered college sports for women are, in order: (1) basketball, 98.8% of schools have a team, (2) volleyball, 95.7%, (3) soccer, 92.0%, (4) cross country, 90.8%, and (5) softball, 89.2%. Since 1972, women have also competed in the traditional male sports of wrestling, weightlifting, rugby, and boxing (Winslow). Girls deserve to compete fairly in their sports without getting beaten by mediocre male athletes and potentially being injured. This law restores sex-based protections for female athletes to not get hurt in their sports. Allowing male and female students to compete with one another is a safety issue. There have been multiple instances where girls have become injured after playing contact sports against boys. A lot of the women in our organization were tomboys when they were young. If they were growing up today, then they would be at risk of getting injured. Policies and procedures that may affect students' safety or include allowing mixed sex provisions for sports, toilets, changing and overnight accommodation which impacts on other protected characteristics such as sex and religion or belief. Under Title IX, “institutions may have separate toilet, shower and locker room facilities. And institutions may ‘provide separate housing on the basis of sex.’” Jeldness v. Pearce, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1994). Title IX states that “nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit any educational institution receiving funds under this Act, from maintaining separate living facilities for the different sexes.” 20 U.S.C. § 1686. Title IX’s regulations further state that “[a] recipient may provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex.” 34 C.F.R. § 106.33. Thus, under the plain language of Title IX, schools can have separate restrooms, locker rooms, and showers for boys and girls without jeopardizing funding. Schools were allowing girls to use the same restrooms and locker rooms as their male peers without parental consent. If a girl wanted to identify her way into a facility full of teenage boys, then parents would be left completely in the dark about the fact that their daughter could potentially be in danger. The state of Wisconsin has recently witnessed some "unintended consequences of the proposed Title IX regulations (Brewer, 2023). Following a swim class during first-hour physical education in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, four freshmen girls rinsed off in the women’s locker room. As was their normal practice, they kept their swimsuits on. But as they were showering, an adult male student entered the locker room, undressed, exposed his genitalia, and showered next to the girls, casually announcing, "I’m trans by the way." While this incident is upsetting, what is perhaps equally concerning is that the district administrators failed to do anything for the girls when they learned what happened (Brewer, 2023). It is not "anti-trans and anti-LGBTQ" to ensure that girls are safe in their sports and spaces. Some of the people who benefit from these sex-based protections are lesbian and bisexual. Erasing such protections negatively impacts them just as much as it impacts people who are not included in the LGBTQ+ acronym. Classroom Material "It’s hard to imagine that just forty years ago, young women were not admitted into many colleges and universities, athletic scholarships were rare, and math and science was a realm reserved for boys. Girls square danced instead of playing sports, studied home economics instead of training for "male-oriented" (read: higher-paying) trades. The school curriculum promoted the idea that girls could become teachers and nurses, but not doctors or principals (Winslow, Barbara)." SB 49, dubbed the “Parents' Bill of Rights bans instruction on “gender identity, sexual activity, or sexuality” in kindergarten through fourth grade. Bills like these include pornographic material in schools and lessons about queer ideology. Public schools have recently implemented giving children surveys that ask sexual questions and keep a record of students' mental health, which is an invasion of privacy and wildly inappropriate. For instance, they ask students about sexual intercourse and information about their sexual history, featuring questions like "Have you ever had oral sex? How old were you when you had sexual intercourse for the first time?" They also ask invasive questions about the student's family, mental health, and seek to change their behavior outside of school. These surveys ask children questions about their parents' political opinions, income, and family attitudes (Courage Is A Habit, 2023). Not only is this an invasion of privacy, but many parents feel like their information is being extorted and used as a method of control. These are also carried out without parental knowledge. According to “progressive” activists, saying that you support parental rights is a “homophobic dog whistle.” The gay parents in our movement beg to differ. Gay and lesbian parents don’t want their children exposed to sexualized content in the classroom more than any other set of parents. Assuming that all of us think the same way is woke homophobia at its finest. The Parents' Bill of Rights specifically gives parents the ability to opt-out of this corrupt scam and the option to see the content of these surveys to decide for themselves. Sex Harassment Title IX originally protected girls from various forms of sexual harassment, on the basis of sex. When "gender identity" is added to the category of sex, then that also changes the meaning of sexual harassment. Sexual harassment has been changed to "sex harassment," and refers to anything that does not affirm a child's "gender identity." It mandates that teachers and staff use the child's preferred pronouns and allow them to go by a different name and persona in school than at home. Parents are left in the dark. Bills like the ones passed in North Carolina require that parents be notified “prior to any changes in the name or pronoun used for a student in school records or by school personnel." It also will discipline teachers who purposely keep secrets from parents. The guidelines asserted that students' identities were being socially transitioned at school because this would positively affect their mental health. However, recent data says otherwise. A new study that recently came out surveyed 1,655 parents of children who have recently adopted a cross-sex identity. They found that after social transition, children became much worse off, showing an increase in psychosocial distress (Diaz et. al, 2023). Their mental health deteriorated considerably. Socially transitioning a child at school might actually harm children’s mental health. If children are told that they are trapped in the wrong body and the only way that they can be happy is if they amputate their body parts, then they are going to become anxious, insecure, and scared. Not only that, but it would be considered "sex harassment" for teachers to not play along. These "trans kids" are being celebrated every day and told that they are living their authentic selves by pretending to be something that they aren't. Instead of helping distressed children navigate their identity, their confusion is reinforced. Social transition is directly correlated with persistence in trans identity, and these children are more likely to become sterilized with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. LET KIDS BE KIDS! Everyone figures themselves out eventually. These topics are way too complex for children to understand. Gays Against Groomers fully supports the laws that are being put in place to roll back "gender identity" policies in schools and bring the education system back to normal. None of these laws are anti-gay in the slightest, and we do not appreciate them being framed as such. As we firmly stated in our testimony that we submitted on behalf of Chapter 117 in Maine, we made it clear that "Children are NOT a social experiment. While you usher minors down a conveyor belt to lifelong pharmaceutical dependency, we will continue to stand against you until the abuse is stopped. This has gone on long enough and we will not allow this to be done in our name. Children deserve to grow up into healthy adults and live their life in ways which make them happy. Policies like this one prevent them from ever achieving that." We contacted The Department of Education this Spring and demanded that Title IX and similar laws be legislated the way they were intended to be – on the basis of sex not gender. We even passed a bill in Missouri that does exactly that. An ideologically-charged education system that prioritizes affirming every child's special identity makes it impossible to address necessary academic needs. Public schools are failing in their basic mission to educate young Americans; as a result, we are in the midst of a full-blown disaster of illiteracy and innumeracy. Eighth graders’ average math test scores have dropped to their lowest levels in 35 years. Their reading scores are the lowest in two decades (Matthew, 2023). The sexualized material puts them at risk of dissociating from their embodied reality. And it encourages them to adopt a potentially harmful identity, sometimes leading to sterilization. This entire system needs to be dismantled and backpedaled to where it was just a few short years ago. We are on the right side of history. And we will continue to speak out and fight until laws like these are passed nationwide, Queer Theory is no longer referenced in classrooms, and "gender identity" is destroyed once and for all. REFERENCES Title IX Fact Sheet (2022) https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9nprm-factsheet.pdf Title IX -- Proposed Changes https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9nprm.pdf Title IX Of The Education Amendments Of 1972 https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-ix-education-amendments-1972# Senate Bill 49 -- Parents' Bill of Rights https://ncleg.gov/BillLookUp/2023/S49 Fairness in Women's Sports Act https://www.ncleg.gov/BillLookUp/2023/h574 https://twitter.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1691941538266222794?t=4knlta_d3D7D3nfaraAzJA&s=19 North Carolina legislature overrides governor’s vetoes to enact 3 bills targeting transgender youth Dianne Gallagher, 2023 https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/16/politics/north-carolina-gop-governor-veto-override-transgender-bills/index.html?utm_term=link&utm_content=2023-08-17T00%3A05%3A49&utm_source=twcnnbrk&utm_medium=social The facade of gender identity is failing our students ELIZABETH GRACE MATTHEW, 2023 https://thehill.com/opinion/education/4115665-the-facade-of-gender-identity-is-failing-our-students/ "Think of the Children” has become a dangerous dog whistle for regressive ideas (2022) https://www.highlandernews.org/84311/think-of-the-children-has-become-a-dangerous-dog-whistle-for-regressive-ideas/ Biden's Title IX changes mean this locker room horror is coming to a school near you (Brewer, 2023) https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/bidens-title-ix-changes-locker-room-horror-school The Impact of Title IX (Barbara Winslow) https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/impact-title-ix Courage Is A Habit Data Mining Your Child: What You Can Do To Stop It https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qYYvVo5T8jDsxdtYgOYEdoa3s5I-HmHa/view?usp=drivesdk Courage Is A Habit SEL Bloodline https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F2LwsweGWb6YgoO6I-M71XyOPQqfG3t3/view?usp=drivesdk SEL Surveys https://courageisahabit.org/#selsurveys Chapter 117 – Maine https://trackbill.com/bill/maine-legislative-document-394-resolve-regarding-legislative-review-of-chapter-117-rule-regarding-the-duties-of-school-counselors-and-school-social-workers-a-major-substantive-rule-of-the-department-of-education/2347048/ Maine LD 1735 https://legislature.maine.gov/LawMakerWeb/summary.asp?ID=280073944 Louisiana HB 466 https://legiscan.com/LA/bill/HB466/2023 Missouri SB 39 https://senate.mo.gov/23info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=44496 Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria: Parent Reports on 1655 Possible Cases Diaz S, Bailey JM. Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria: Parent Reports on 1655 Possible Cases. Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Apr;52(3):1031-1043. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02576-9. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Retraction in: Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Jun 14;: PMID: 36991212; PMCID: PMC10102036.

The film that has been taking America by storm, ‘Sound of Freedom’, has amassed tremendous support from its viewers along with backlash among legacy media. Based on and inspired by the operations of Tim Ballard, a former Department of Homeland Security agent who rescued many children from sex slavery, this powerful and emotional film unravels a tragic story of two children who were forced into the child sex market. The movie serves as a compelling exposé, shedding light to what has long been around us but largely turned a blind eye to – the war on children. Engulfed by its raw story telling, I was moved deeply in a way I never was before. Prior to watching this film, I recognized that child sex trafficking and the pornography industry are major issues in the world but failed to see how pervasive they were in our everyday life until the film brought the issue close to home. The US is the largest consumer of child pornography and the demand only continues to grow. According to the Demand Project, this problem is growing faster than any other criminal act with a 2,500% increase in arrests for child pornography over the last decade. According to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, 17.3 million images and videos of suspected child pornography were viewed in 2011. This is quadruple the amount that was recorded just four years earlier in 2007. Consuming child pornography is much more common than we would like to think. Therefore, it is essential to consider that perhaps the very people that we know may be engulfed by child pornography. It is also equally essential to consider that as a result of this growing trend, a discrete pedophilic agenda is all around us and we must remain vigilant. The proliferation of pedophilic propaganda has been successful because the war on children is carried out in discreteness and hides behind multiple disguises. This pedophilic spirit is rampant and lively, spreads like a virus, and latches itself into other social movements disguised as activism. The latest examples being “LGBTQ+ rights”, “Trans rights”, drag queen story hour, and the “gender affirming care” movement. Because its spread is subtle and hides behind a positive cause, it fools well-meaning individuals into supporting ideas that actually exploit minors. This pedophilic agenda is also successful because it weaponizes terms such as “homophobic” and “transphobic” to destroy anyone who can point out its influence. We can all learn from the works of Tim Ballard. Doing so allows us to see the bigger picture and examine the extent to which sexual exploitation influences culture. Its seeds have trickled into every aspect of society, including LGB and T culture. Gays Against Groomers has dedicated itself in the past year to waking up our community to the child abuse and pedophilic behavior that radical queer and trans ideology encourages – eroding sexual boundaries and taking advantage of children's innocence. THE PEDOPHILE DOCTRINE Tim Ballard extensively studied the literature of the Dutch Party for Neighborly Love, Freedom, and Diversity, a pro-pedophile political party, and discovered what he calls “The Pedophile Network Doctrines”. In an interview with The Daily Signal, Tim Ballard breaks down these doctrines. “They include things like: (1) separate children from parents, because parents are a bad influence, the state knows best; (2) sexualize kids, let them see pornography; (3) take God out of education because that just gets in the way; and (4) kids consent, consent, consent. Children can consent to anything.” said Ballard. “Now, what am I seeing here? My stomach is getting sick as I’m reading this. I read this every day. It’s the woke Left agenda. I'm not saying that they are colluding or talking, it doesn't matter it’s the same dark source. Pedophiles are sitting back right now going: we’ve been pushing this agenda for decades and now we don't have to push it anymore because the Left is taking care of it for us in America.” he exclaimed. Can you think of obvious examples of these doctrines flourishing under “LGBTQ+ progress?" 1. Separate children from parents, the state knows best. The recent push for California bill AB 957, in which the state could make a decision about parental custody by taking a parent's affirmation (or lack thereof) about their child’s chosen gender into account, is a prime example. 2. Sexualize kids, let them see pornography. Recently on July 29, 2023, at a Wisconsin “All Ages Pride Event”, GAG protested drag queen story hour for children who flaunted provocative short dresses, fish nets, and high heels. A member of Brew City Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence paced back and forth around children wearing sexually revealing clothing and kink-inspired accessories such as a cat collar and leash around her neck. Although it is not direct pornography, it is directly desensitizing children into thinking this is normal and appropriate. 3. Take God out of education. Teaching about God in schools is a debatable topic. But we are making generations of LGB and T individuals believe that God does not welcome them when that is far from the truth. We need an active pursuit of spirituality to eradicate this dark force. 4. Children can consent to anything. In the same interview, Ballard added, “This whole trans ideology foist on children, what they’re saying is, children can consent to having their bodies filled with a chemical that will destroy their reproductive system. They can consent to ripping apart their genitalia. Like, this is insanity—in and of itself it’s horrible. But what it’s going to lead to is what the pedophiles have been asking for. If you can consent to that, guess what? What’s more fluid than gender? Age.” FIGHTING THE ROOT CAUSE The unexpected blockbuster hit ‘Sound of Freedom’ is a movie with a tremendous impact no one saw coming. While its critics accuse the film of misrepresenting human trafficking, having ties to QAnon conspiracies, and being too “sensational," this work of art continues to wake up (or “unwoke”) our country. In order to defeat the despicable perversions that have gained prominence in radical queer activism, we must explore and support the works of others who protect children, such as Tim Ballard and GAG. Although Ballard and GAG fight the war on children from different angles, we must see the connections between our works and recognize that a crucial part of this multifaceted fight is destroying the root cause of these wars: sex trafficking and the pornography industry, the silent epidemics of the world. Pornography fuels sex trafficking operations. It destroys marriages and relationships, it continuously distorts and corrupts the minds of millions of men, women, and children. Pornography has no respectable place in our society. We must bring forth discussions and awareness on this visual and destructive opioid. We must pledge to never again consume the grime that porn entices us with for the sake of ourselves, sex trafficking victims, for the preservation of the gay community, and generations to come. We must consider how this has shaped the way we have conversations about these issues and the programming behind it. These industries did not reach heights of power overnight. It took decades of slow sexual infiltration to collectively groom individuals to form society as we know it today. Perhaps that is why well-meaning people cannot conceptualize the filth that Gays Against Groomers so rigidly rejects. Perhaps they have been conditioned by these industries to accept porn in children’s “LGBTQ+” books. Perhaps it is why no attendee of the Wisconsin “All Ages Pride Event” questioned the Brew Sister of Perpetual Indulgence’s inappropriate attire for the event other than the protestors. We must break free from decades of collective grooming. We must be courageous in exposing the sexual deviancies that quietly walk around us, despite its repercussions. And until we eradicate these vicious industries, generations of American children will continue to be victimized and destroyed, including those who view radical activist communities as a “safe space." Sources: https://thedemandproject.org/statistics/ https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/06/28/transgender-movement-biden-border-policy-aid-abet-child-sex-slavery-tim-ballard-warns https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB957